this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
457 points (95.4% liked)

Science Memes

11021 readers
4388 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 51 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Really? First time I hear about these birbs, that sounds really cool :D I'm off to Wikipedia to fact check brb baiii

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 32 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well after about an hour of reading I found plenty of examples of gender reversal examples and some cool behaviors but nothing regarding chromosomes seems easily accessible or even mentioned. Reproductive behavior seems to be one of the main criteria used to establish evolutionary relationships (aka the cladogram) but that's as far as the layman can find online. I didn't search in Scholar though.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7198006/

Edit, lmao:

The wattled jacana (Jacana jacana) belongs to clade Scolopaci, and its karyotype has not been reported yet. It is an interesting species with a polyandrous mating system, in which a single female defends a harem of up to four males by aggressively excluding other females from their territory; males provide nearly all parental care (Osborne et al., 1977; Emlen and Wrege, 2004).

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Only in the day time, like most birbs. Otherwise they're "sleep".

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Years down the line I will wonder why I saved this comment but I hope it will still make me giggle like an idiot then too.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago

Question dodged. "What is 'real'?" - Morpheus

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oh birds are real. Very, very real. The question is, real whats?

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No. There haven't been any real birds since the US government exterminated them in the 60s. Any "bird" you see today is a surveillance drone.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Even if they were surveilance drones they'd still be real, as opposed to mass hallucinations beamed into our visual cortexes by satellites. Of course, they're not actually surveilance drones, that's just a conspiracy theory started by the CIA to identify and monitor conspiracy 'super-spreaders' who can be used to spread whatever memetic trope the goverment of the day wants. No, really they genetically altered most plant species to act as resonant cavity bugging devices like The Great Seal. They monitor them with the same satellites they definately don't use to beam out mass hallucinations.

/s of course, because, haha, that would just be silly, and I don't want to be picked up and 'reprogrammed'.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 5 days ago

Spy drones.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 5 days ago

Good message, but holy hell, this belongs in !aneurysmposting@sopuli.xyz

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

can we have a version that's less concise? maybe 500 words or so.

all you need is one saying it's confusing and the other saying "x birds can do it with a pea brain."

that's it.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago
  1. What?
  2. the lack of Pixels doesn't help the understanding
[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Wait wait tell me whats going on in the montanan high plains!

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

birbs be hittin’ it

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 12 points 5 days ago

Damn these government bird-drone manufacturer DEI programs, really trying to pander to the woke LGBT cultural marxists...

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

really all it should take is just the word "seahorse", most people have at some point heard about how the males carry the children there. Can't really dismiss that.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't think it could look worse and yet here we are

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sadly, any more jpeg would ruin the small amount of legibility it still has.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 13 points 5 days ago

Needs a few more minutes in the frying oil.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -5 points 5 days ago

Pṙſėnėlı, Uı'm moṙ fȯnd v ð egzæmpėl v Prıhiſtorik Plænet'z femboı teırosoṙz.

spoilerPersonally, I'm more fond of the example of prehistoric planet's femboy pterosaurs.