this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
346 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 111 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet the state’s rights crowd will love this

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Literally the civil war started because kansas didn't want to be a slave state. The whole state's right thing is just a talking point not a held belief.

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you saying the next civil war will be fought over abortion and LGBTQ rights?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm just saying the whole "state's rights" things is sort of a red herring. The right believes they don't have to follow the rules; "crimes are when undesireables do things only I should be allowed to do"

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it's more likely blue states secede than civil war. If enough liberal folks got on board, the conservatives would bit at the chance to be the new USA with a majority of the states.

I also think the impetus won't be social, it will be economic.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Cecession will literally start a new civil war. I'm looking forward to killing some traitors.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 73 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

No concrete plans yet but we’ll see what they can do. Good to see that some people haven’t given up all hope.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Do not give up hope. Don't stop trying to make the world a better place. As long as we have people that take action, we still have hope.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm done, y'all can have hope. My hope was deleted long ago.

[–] andrewthe95th@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm prone to thinking like that too, but what keeps me from staying that way is the knowledge that that's exactly what the fascists want. So fuck em, it may be illogical but they can pry my belief that we can build a better world from my cold dead hands.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Fighting fascism is a great cause to rally behind and give people purpose.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This is where I'm landing too. I will stay hopeful out of spite for these fuckers.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've done nothing useful or transformative.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't need to be a rockstar. Almost nobody's a rockstar. We need you to be you and to give at least one shit.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Just the smallest shit. One iota. One atom.

Don't give in to what those fuckers want.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

If nothing else, save a little for the next vote in 2 years. We can't afford to lose you.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still have hope... just not for America. I can make somewhere else better.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately, I believe America affects the world.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

True, at least the magas don’t have full control of every state government.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats the small hope I'm hanging on to. Federalism might save our country from fascism. Hopefully...

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It will do the exact same thing that happened last time:

Create a civil war.

As the good option.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

California should just separate from Fed

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A constitutional crisis is very likely over the next 4 years. And if it does, all bets are off.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The crisis already happened when the SC declared the President a dictator and Biden didn't have them executed for it with the powers they just gave him.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Technically they said Presidents and Former Presidents cannot be prosecuted for it, not give them the authority to. You still have to find a "yes-man" to obey those orders. Biden can try, tell the military to kill SCOTUS members for treason, they say "Sorry Mr. President No-can-do". Biden might be immune for trying to do it.

*keyword "might" be, but Scotus can say "that was not an official act"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

*keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn't exist anymore.

Any new justices would certainly certainly hold the Biden-preferred opinion, because otherwise he wouldn't nominate them. (That opinion would neither be "Biden is immune and this is fine" nor "that was not an official act," but rather "we're overturning the previous decision and making the President prosecutable for illegal official acts again," because forcing that ruling would be the entire point of the exercise, BTW.)

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

deleted by creator

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

He could have asked for volunteers. I know one person.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Solve the water crisis, then yeah

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Australia uses desalinization and it works well.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

5th largest economy in the world, motherfuckers!

We don't need the US, but their military means we're fucked should we ever try, anyway

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly I'd feel safer if we reduce the power of the federal government and put the power to the states. Sorry left-leaning people in red states, can't let states like yours drag the country down with you.

[–] SolarMonkey 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As someone in a swing state, I’d be ok with that. Make the US like the EU.

For one thing, every 4 years residents of swing states get relentlessly harassed and it fucking sucks. But also It’s so so much easier to make changes on a smaller local level without the influence of distant populations. Sure it would suck in some ways and for some states, but maybe if each state only had to convince a few thousand people to do better, rather than literally millions (presidential election, very demoralizing), swing states would be more left leaning.

And if not, well it would probably be a lot easier to move states than move countries, even if they were EU style countries.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

After all, you don't need to learn a new language or integrate into a new culture when you move. People move in Europe all the time, and the US states is easy mode compared to that

[–] theedqueen@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, please. Protecting and solidifying rights in the areas we can is the only way we can get through this nightmare. Hopefully progressives can claw back from this although it’s going to take generations.