this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
219 points (98.7% liked)

News

23274 readers
2988 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How is this even a choice?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...it

...it isn't.

They should have arresting authority over anyone illegally barring them entry.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...it

...it probably is.

Since Shelby v Holder they are restrained in where they can monitor - they need a court order to do so and can't follow old guidelines that let them monitor in "historically racist" locations like Texas.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/about-federal-observers-and-election-monitoring

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If memory serves, Shelby was just about the ability of the DOJ to require states from the former Confederacy to get DOJ's approval before making any changes to their election laws, where this is about DOJ's ability to monitor any state's actual implementation of their election laws

Either way, illegitimate decision from an illegitimate court that wouldn't have any precedential value if we lived in a decent country, but yeah, back in the one we actually live in who knows what is and isn't legal anymore.

e; DOJs? I'm pretty sure there's just the one, autocorrect

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

If memory serves, Shelby was just about the ability of the DOJ to require states from the former Confederacy to get DOJ’s approval before making any changes to their election laws, where this is about DOJ’s ability to monitor any state’s actual implementation of their election laws

This is quite incorrect. I would read the link I provided.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We allways hear that surveilence and monitoring is good, and that you don't have to be afraid unless you have something to hide.

Is this an admission that this isn't true, or that they have something to hide?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

They have something to hide. They don't want the feds showing up and messing up their plans to intimidate voters.

Speaking of which, lest anyone think this is just a Trump thing and that the GOP was all good before he showed up, check out what William Rehnquist and Barry Goldwater were up to on the 1960s (arc'd) (tl;dr harassing black and Mexican voters with literacy tests).

[–] darthsid@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

United States of America is a fucking joke. Pretending to be a democracy.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it were just pretending, Trump wouldn't have left the white house 4 years ago.

[–] darthsid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

He tried his fucking best not to didn’t he? And curious to see if he’ll quit if he wins this time after his turn.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The Current administration response should be:

https://youtu.be/i2k8jhGFJDA