this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
272 points (95.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

442 readers
2 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 76 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Apparently it's the button you press to get banned from a community.

ASK ME HOW I KNOW

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So stuupid 😆

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fine, I'll do it, how ya know?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 55 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A lot of those are joke downvotes, well mine was.

[–] Nemo 89 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I downvote anyone complaining about downvote out of principle.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I'll also down vote anyone using up votes as some kind of metric for their post/comment being inherently right/good

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mine wasn't.

Communities trying to have alternate meanings for upvotes/downvotes must keep in mind that people scrolling posts across communities won't generally notice the community and if they do they won't read the rules and will vote however they want. Trying to force them to follow some silly community specific process is tilting at windmills and bitching about it is embarrassing.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Fr like if you don't like the way people are using the downvote feature why make a post whinging about it and not just make your account on an instance that has it disabled???

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

aren't they the instance admin themselves?

[–] Kierunkowy74@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago

Indeed, and this is a pinned post on Ye Power Trippin' Bastards. Posters ask if their bans were justified. Downvotes bury the post, preventing an audience from making their opinion about it.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Even funnier tbh

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sadly one can't disable downvotes per community

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Because it has a legit use. It's just also used to create an echo chamber.

If you believe that people can be just a little responsible, it's better to have it around.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, just add a 'disagree' button so there's no confusion.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

That's just the Uber disagree button now.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago

It's a bit of an unwinnable battle. People will always use it as disagree button

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I'll stop using the downvotes as a disagree button when everyone else stops using upvotes as an agree button.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I actually think up- and downvotes are inherently asymmetrical in this respect.

Upvoting things you agree with is fine and a main use of the function. Why then is downvoting things you disagree with wrong? Because the purpose of voting is visibility, you upvote things you want people to see, like arguments you agree with, and downvote those you don't think people should see.

Now if you believe in having an open discussion you don't want to suppress posts just because you disagree with them. Disagreeing is fine, so downvoting is reserved for posts that detract from the conversation.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

you upvote a comment saying they love cats
you ignore a comment saying they don't like cats
you downvote a comment saying they hate cats because cats are evil
and you report a comment saying they eat cats

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Earnest question- what is it supposed to be used for? I don't downvote people very often, but I think I've only ever seen it used express approval or disapproval so that the score reflects community sentiment

How is it supposed to be used?

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In addition to what others said, in comments the down vote is meant to be used on comments that don't further discussion in good faith.

I used to subscribe to that idea, but I've since changed my mind. If the far majority use upvotes to mean agreement, then me upvoting a controversial, but well structured, opinion will likely be viewed as agreement as well.

It's a nice idea to think the voting system is meant to promote discussion, instead of homogenise opinions in a community.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that's kind of the nature of communication I think, and ultimately votes are a form of communication :/

If people understand them to mean agreement or disagreement, that's the message they'll recieve regardless of whether it was the message that you were trying to send.

I guess if I wanna convey I appreciate someone's contribution even though I don't share their perspective I can always leave a comment; that seems like something I'd appreciate seeing in my inbox so maybe it's worthwhile for me to make that a habit

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah that's something I do sometimes as well. I usually just don't vote on a comment as a third option for when I disagree with them, but don't want to punish having a different viewpoint ^^

[–] dch82@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

when a post doesn't fit the community purpose or is generally inappropriate

[–] olsplasher@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that where you use the report functionality?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

This post does not present the requisite context, which is that this community is a bit special in comparison to others. Read the sidebar text where it explains more how the mod wants people to use it differently. On Reddit there were some others like that, e.g. CMV, and had different-styled icons to help people realize that - before the days where people just expected every single sub to function identically so that they could bother not reading the sub rules before posting or commenting in it.

e.g.:

Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

It's a tool for curating the content, upvote posts you want people to see, and downvote those you think should be hidden. So stuff that's irrelevant, factually incorrect, pointless, inflammatory etc.

Thinking that something should be hidden just because you disagree with it is problematic.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Ok but even if its for something else everyone else is still using it for that. And on another note, why shouldnt i use it to show disapproval?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

However you want to use it.

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yes they are. No matter the intent that is what they are.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 8 points 2 months ago

Spot on. Upvotes/downvotes are for voting on the quality of comment only in theory. In practice, they are agree/disagree buttons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tejan@hubzilla.monster 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always thought a downvote was just a silent "Booooooooooo!"

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's what it should be, a "booo!" for lazy and willfully ignorant comments.

In practice most people downvote any take they disagree with, no matter if it was expressed well, written respectfully, and contributes to the conversation.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

As a rule of thumb I downvote any post that mentions being downvoted or complains about the reaction to a post or comment.

I will give this whole thread a pass, though 🙂

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I couldn't even post an album there because the instance apparently sees external imgur albums as image spam or something stupid.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] scott@authorship.studio 8 points 2 months ago

It would be interesting to see how people would behave if you had both a "Disagree" and a "Low Quality" button. Would it make any difference, or would people who dislike it also hit the low quality button out of spite?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think this kind of voting system intentionally places the content people want to see (i.e. agree with), at the top which increases active users.

But it doesn't stimulate healthy debate and definitely doesn't encourage going against the mainstream.

Slashdot had a more interesting system that let only a select number of people rank quality and set a post category (like funny, informative, etc).

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think it's a nice sentiment, but you can't change emergent behavior just by saying "this is wrong"

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

This is wrong.

load more comments
view more: next ›