this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
427 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58833 readers
5618 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously broke up in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

... 7 members of Hezbollah injured.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

That brought a legit chuckle!

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It was probably an emergency exit hatch for the magic rocket gas.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 56 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That's actually quite impressive because most satellites just don't do anything when they die. Boeing's vehicles die with flare, and depressing regularity

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago

"in space no one can hear you scream"

Boeing satellites: "AHHHHHH!!!"

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago

Great, more bits of dangerous junk in orbit. The fuckers should have to clear up their mess before it fucks up other satellites.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 77 points 7 hours ago

What, was it blowing a whistle?

[–] lunar17@lemmy.world 30 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is slightly concerning. Satellites don't tend to explode on their own, but it is a Boeing design with a history of leaky propulsion, so who knows?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Sure it was a Comm satellite for the world's tensest area, which is about to go to bigger war.

who would have ASAT capability at GEO?

how could it be launched to GEO undetected?

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago

If you’re a government, you can pretty much put anything in a rocket fairing and call it a reconnaissance satellite.

The only warning that actually has to be given is that a rocket is being launched, so you don’t accidentally trigger WW3 by setting off launch detection satellites without warning. After it’s in space, no one can really tell what was in the fairing. Could be a spy satellite, could be navigation. Could just be a box with a bunch of little rockets in it, designed to slam into whatever you want at ridiculous speed.

But it’s way more likely that this was just Boeing having a tiny leak in a propellant tank, or a bad thruster and as soon as the concentration of propellant and oxidizer got high enough, it triggered a detonation. They certainly have a history of not leak testing their shit: airplanes falling apart, space capsules with leaky thrusters, and now a blown up satellite point more towards incompetence than malice.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a trick question? Cause you might as well be asking a 1600s peasant how to develop film.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You burn a witch and pray.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 5 points 4 hours ago

Instructions Unclear : gave my wife Chlamydia.

[–] dreikelvin@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Satellite: "But I wasn't boing anything wrong!"

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Rapid unscheduled disassembly.

Plus “Into pieces” is rather unnecessary there.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You can explode without turning into pieces, though

[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Arguable. I’d say it’s the same but the size of the pieces varies.

[–] MelodiousFunk 5 points 2 hours ago

Where do pieces end and particles begin?

philosoraptor.jpg

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago) (1 children)

did you know that high powered lasers are invisible to the naked eye without a sufficient particulate medium to pass through?

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 hours ago

Good thing I'm wearing clothes.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 17 points 7 hours ago

Was it a Satellite Max?

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 28 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Boeing: outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer who outsources to an outsourcer and so on and still has the shamelessness of appearing surprised at the shit quality and reliability they deliver

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago

Sounds like that case of the sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-contracted killing in China that one time

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really into the stock market, but I would not buy Boeing at the moment.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Now would be the best time to do it

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Assuming it bounces back up

Their vehicles don't, so i wouldn't hold my breath

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

If it doesn't do it on its own, one of 2 things will happen:

  1. They get bought out, which almost always results in a bump.
  2. The government bails them out, which is an even bigger bump.
[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

I did read about this yesterday, and as far as I know the name of the sat is intelsat 33e and its for communication purposes. I'm curious to know what really happen, how it broke.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 65 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Man they are just on fire lately

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

~~on fire~~ rapidly decompressing

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Lol I believe it would be rapid uncontrolled oxidation

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

Not in space, though?

[–] Technotica@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The satellite went boing boing?

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

No, not double boing. It went triple boing.

load more comments
view more: next ›