1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
A big one is "How does an instance change their underlying implementation?". Like how could a lemmy instance decide to migrate to become a Mastodon instance?
Currently that's just not possible, but it seems important for the long term survival of an instance. It seems naive to think that an instance will stay the same implementation forever. But ActivityPub basically makes this impossible.
it's useful to be able to change implementation, but I'm not sure if changing also the platform type is a good idea. that's a different instance then, with the former one being shut down. mastodon and lemmy are quite different.
lemmy has multiple implementations already. when switching between them only the database and the structure of the attachment storage should need to be converted, and ideally that should be done by the implementation you are switching to.
lemmy has multiple implementations already
No it doesn't? There is only one Lemmy implementation. There are some similar alternatives like PieFed and Mbin but those are separate implementations and are not in any way related to Lemmy, aside from using the same ActivityPub extensions.
There is really no such thing as a "platform type" - it's all ActvityPub under the hood.
openlemmy?
I'll never stop wondering why this guy was trying to not poop for 3 days.
That mystery still keeps me up at night sometimes. Looks like that account got deleted so it will probably remain unanswered.
And it coincided with the small scale mutiny by Wagner against Putin.
Did it also coincide with Hajj?
God, what a wonderful thread that was. I've decided to follow and star @mizu@lemmy.world so I can follow up on their future exploits.
Sadly, it doesn't appear that they've posted in quite some time. Hopefully they'll come out of hiding one day and ask more ridiculous questions.
It seems they deleted their account. But yeah that thread was really funny, the responses were good too
I'm going with fuck-tent
Scalability. Federation adds overhead that increases as the number of instances increases. It is unclear to me when we will hit a wall but it's probably not far off.
How will we pay the bills. Some instances get enough donations to pay server costs but none get enough to pay for staff or developers.
Both of those are only really problems if the fediverse grows, which it hasn't for a while now. But that could change at any moment.
Might just be a different ratio of people to involvement to infrastructure that scales.
Who is actually funding lemmy.ml?
So the lmy devs make less than minimum wage
Why is this a burning question? I see a lot of people complain about ml, but I haven't had any issues with users or their communities; though the latter I've had sparing interactions with.
Same. For every 1 .ml interaction that the have, I get 9 other randos aggressively telling me how aggressive .ml is. It's irony at its finest tbh.
In general, I find those 9 other randos more likely to tell me to fuck off.
They advocate voting abstinence and voting third party a lot. That's a view that has been connected with Russian propaganda ops designed to put Trump in the White House.
China
When will the amount of spam and astroturfing outpace the glacial development of moderation tools and destroy the whole thing?
If the current leading theory of dark matter being a fundamental particle means that there were "two big bangs" why would the dark big bang have to appear second?
Bro.
Will it last?
That's always been my concern. I've seen a lot of great alternatives come up over the years, some last a few years, but some also have lasted a couple months. I think the Fediverse as a concept and as an idea will last a lot longer than anything that branches off from it. So even if Lemmy dies or KBin goes or something else. There will always be a Fediverse and something will come off from it that will continue.
Is it part of the same dynamics as mainstream social media? Meaning, can we make it substancially better than Twitter, Reddit & Co or do we always have some baseline negativity and not so great group dynamics?
do we always have some baseline negativity
Sounds like a flesh & blood hardware problem. 🤭
I'd wager that enshittification is inevitable, but the Fediverse can "live on" between cycles because instances or even entire systems can go down while new Fediverse ones take their place.
Plus, fediverse clusters can break apart like tectonic plates and become continents if any serious barriers need to happen. It might happen over time if any instances start to specialize. Never know.
I'd be a shame if it really broke apart. I mean that would be more a De-Fediverse. Like all the Discourse forums where I need to open up every single one of them to read what's new, because they're specialized and not interconnected in practice. I'd advocate for the instances to still interconnect while doing whatever they want. And giving more control to the individual user. Ultimately... it's complicated. We have things like (instance) local timelines in some federated software. And it'd be great to have distinct Lemmy places/instances. One for political debate and news, one dedicated to Free Software... That's kind of what communities are for. But it's the same people in all larger ones. And the instances all look the same, and topics and interests are not part of the onboarding process. So people currently end up on some random instance.
rss!!!
I should do that. I got rid of my newsreader like 10 years ago when I noticed I was doomscrolling through the news every morning and afternoon. And it consumed too much of my energy. Maybe I should start fresh with a small and curated smaller list. I kind of forgot about RSS aside from podcasts... So thanks for the advice.
What's to stop people from making "tunnel" instances, maybe even with reposts?
That aside, ultimately, we're at the mercy of whoever is paying for the instance, and their interests. So if everything does fragment, it's just kinda the nature of the hosts.
Sure. The nice thing is, it's all Free Software. I pay like 6€ a month for my own small server. I'm at my own mercy.
Conflating Xitter with the R-site seems a bit harsh. One is a bubbling morass of incivility and lying, an infernal radicalization machine, the world's virtual toilet wall. The other is a generally successful community whose control structure is excessively private and centralized. That's the way I see it, anyway.
Sure. X is a toxic mess. And has been for quite some time. Whereas I kinda liked the community on Reddit. Quite some nice people there and good conversations. Unfortunately the company behind it likes to F their moderators and users. Kicked them out for speaking up, made the platform worse and Apps don't work anymore. And they put in a decent amount of effort to specifically F us over, so I left. But I get what you say. That's not the community's fault.
Can it run Doom?
"Lemmy Plays Doom".
Doom runs for 0.5 seconds and the video is uploaded to the LPD community.
Most upvoted action in the comments after a day gets applied to the game and the next 0.5s of gameplay video is uploaded to a new post.
Repeat until WR is achieved.
Might need some moderator discretion to normalise comments to in-game actions (or fuck it, send it to an LLM)
How can I make it not feel empty? (And why I can't find any good posts on it?)
Any good posts?
I think the answer to this is lack of adoption.
Will the Fediverse switch away from ActivityPub to ATProto?
ATProto is what Bluesky uses, right? It'd be nice if someone could give a quick summary of the features and what differentiates it compared to ActivityPub.
It seems like it would be a pretty big task to switch from ActivityPub, because each fediverse project would have to implement that independently.
There are a number of features that make them different, but the major one that makes me favour ATProto is that it gets around the centralization problems of the Fediverse.
I'm @savvywolf@pawb.social on ActivityPub, this means:
In addition, there isn't any way to transfer data between ActivityPub instances. Sure you can set up redirects in Mastodon, but there's no way to actually transfer information or history.
There's really no reason these three things all need to be managed by the same entity (pawb.social in my case).
Under ATProto:
If I don't like the way Bluesky is going I can just... Leave. I can move my data to another platform and log in to another frontend. All without my followers even noticing a difference or losing any content.
It also has some cool features. For example, there's this thing which allows you to just set up pronouns so that they are visible on your own profile to other people that use the list. https://bsky.app/profile/pronouns.adorable.mom All implemented without any protocol extensions.
Dumb backend, smart frontend?
Basically, have hosts replace services like AWS but don't make them have any power (except for choosing if they agree to host NSFW content or not) and make the data they host public so anyone can develop a frontend to access it, a single account giving you access to everything, administer your own experience, mods have control over the communities they moderate but there's no admin that can decide you don't have access to a big chunk of the content because they don't want to be federated with certain instances.
Are there insurmountable technical obstacles to supporting both? Serious question.
I don't think so - there's already a project that bridges between AT and AP, so in theory it's possible for that to just be pulled into Mastodon proper.
However, that's not to say it'll be easy. It'll be a years of work with lots of challenges and drama.
Both are in the fediverse, perhaps think of them as distant galaxies