this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
84 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

1223 readers
140 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alice@beehaw.org 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Despite the slurs, Mr Swenson was glad that the hackers had announced their presence so loudly.

It would have been much worse, he said, if they had decided to quietly observe his family inside their home.

They could've peered through his robot's camera, and listened through the microphone, without him having the slightest clue.

Why does a vacuum cleaner have a spy camera and microphone? Insane thing to have in a house with children.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Camera makes some amount of sense. Can be used to keep it from running over wires, or getting caught up in something like a loose curtain. Stuff that would be difficult to handle with non-visual sensors.

Microphone? Oh hell no. No purpose.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, yeah that makes sense. Brainfart on my part.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

The camera is used for visual odometry. They're usually black and white and very low resolution though.

Microphone, I have no idea. Could be useful for floor type detection or something? Voice control?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know people like to have faith in technology but I live by the idea that "if it connects to the internet, it will be hacked/hackable."

Fuck that noise, I'll push my "old school" vacuum around tyvm...

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

Not just things connected to the internet. Radio-controlled things can also be hacked/hackable. Electronic devices are prone to EM interference. Air-gapped systems have flaws somewhere, even if the flaws come from the human operators (social engineering, humans are hackable). There's no such thing as a non-hackable thing.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Don't buy Chinese electronics where possible. Frankly I just figure they all have built in flaws.

[–] besmtt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

That guy has some compelling arguments against localisation on this page.

[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is the answer.

We really need regulation at the FCC level also, such that users are able to physically disable any and all WiFi radios in the device. I want to buy a tv and completely physically disable any wireless radios there in (I don’t want my electronics band hopping in free WiFi unless I’ve asked them too).

We also need privacy regulation at the FTC such that any product capable of connecting to the internet discloses such, gives the user at any time an export of the data it has waiting for export or the last export it did, and allows for the owner to disable any such data export over the internet on a permanent basis.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just flip them over or turn off your router bro...

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Some real tyler the creator energy