this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
201 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This should have been done long ago.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If the Supreme Court lets it stand. Reminder: executive agencies don’t have deference to independently interpret laws like the Clean Drinking Water Act anymore, so this new rule will stand until someone decides to challenge it, and until a court decides they’d rather continue poisoning future generations instead of allowing the experts to do their jobs, which is something SCOTUS would apparently prefer.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Literally EVERY red state will sue to keep those pipes.

I mean, obviously not all of them, the rich neighborhoods will have their shit fixed quick, but damned if Tennessee will spend good money to fix pipes going to those people.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I assume the rich neighborhoods will have already have had their pipes replaced, in which case it would only be those people who are affected. Not that I have anything to back that suspicion up.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Lead make stupid. Stupid make right votes.

[–] silence7 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is why it's absolutely essential to elect enough Democrats in the Senate to enable court expansion.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From what I understand this election cycle is not favorable to that whatsoever. If I recall correctly we might even lose the Senate :(

[–] silence7 5 points 1 month ago

The Senate is absolutely a very tough lift; it's going to be really tough for the Democrats to get even 50 seats.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But who will vote for the Republicans if they do this‽

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't worry, it's not the lead that make Americans stupid.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's definitely SOME of it...

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah. We don't have lead in our pipes and we have plenty of cookers

Unfortunately, we do have twitter and Facebook though

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you President Biden. The infrastructure guy.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

🎶JOE BIDEN THE INFRASTRUCTURE GUY! JOE! JOE! JOE!🎵

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Piping rules!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just about 50 years later than most modernized nations

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

What was that quote? Americans will always do the right thing, after trying every other options.

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago

It’s crazy how shitty my parents end of the Boomers are at taking care of the country. It’s almost as if they’re completely incompetent (they are). They got the shit beat out of them by banks, petrochemical companies and religious weirdos.