Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
I live in NYC. As is tradition, no one likes the mayor. Though this one is among the worst in recent history.
Being mayor of a city like this is so far away from my capabilities. I think you need to be kind of sociopathic or narcissistic to believe you can do this job.
I personally don't understand why the five boroughs (there even being precisely five or six of them, which would make this all the better) don't adopt a system of governance similar to the five Iroquois tribes which once lived right next door to it. It was quite designed against the possibility of totalitarian rule.
Because that kind of federal system doesn't work well when you run a city.
Soooooo, about that indictment...
I know! As I commented on a post about that, I'm sure it was done with great care. You don't criminality indict the sitting mayor of the largest city in the country on federal charges unless you are sure a crime was committed.
Our current mayor complained bitterly because voters expected him to be at his office during a flooding emergency that affected swathes of the city, even though he had a tennis match scheduled. Pretty sure he's not getting a second term.
The funny thing is he might be the one in the right, if we examine with logic.
A mayor probably has no particular skills or abilities to help personally in that sort of situation, and if he was doing his job correctly in the past, then everything in his power to do would already have been done. The appropriate experts are ready. Emergency plans are in place. There's backup plans, and backup plans for the backups, all carefully considered and planned by the best people the mayor could get to do them in the past.
But humans are weird and have stupid ideas, so we want to see the mayor in his office, giving interviews, or even better, at the site of the disaster, helping. Except the most the average mayor is likely to do in an emergency situation is get in the way and be a distraction.
That's the sad thing - your city's mayor may or may not have done a good job, I have no idea, but the average mayor will definitely be attacked if this happens and he doesn't make a show of 'helping'.
The mayor's job is to co-ordinate public information and make press releases during an emergency. He's an authoritative source. Better for people to get info from him than from rumours and hearsay.
Our local Mayor is a millennial. Everyone on the city council is boomer or older. The boomers are children playing highschool politics with obvious smear campaigns, audience plants, and are clamoring about "disrespect" that the mayor showed when forced by the media to make a statement about the councilman doing something so egregious in a meeting it made national news.
I feel bad for the Mayor and hate those city council fucks. But I live outside the city boundary so even though we're affected by their policies we can't vote or anything.
It's horribly shameful.
It's not much of a scene, we've only got the one.
Our mayor is a lesbian who was chief of police. Conservative Democrat. We seem to flip between democrats, who improve the storm drains and try to do things to help citizens, then Republicans who are focused on superficial beautification of the city and paying businesses to come here. All have historically been in bed with developers and there hadn't been much planning. It works ok.
Some of the "city" functions are run by the county not the city - education, transit, health. The county is much more backwards and conservative than the city. Those things are in much worse shape.
We have a mayor, some people complain a out her, others don't. I sat next to her at the airport once. That's all I know.
Historically you don't hear a lot about Baltimore's mayor unless they've done something really awful. In the early 2000s we had some riots that broke out from police brutality (Freddy Grey), The mayor at the time said some very non-choice words and ended up becoming very unpopular very quickly. She was followed up by a mayor that was taking bribes, she was found complicit in businesses having to order a large quantities of her book to receive preferential treatment, ended up with a 3-year prison term. She was followed up by somebody who was okay but short-lived, The current guy that's in there is relatively young, he just turned 40. He's good for the city and he doesn't tend to make controversial decisions, as long as you're a Democrat I suppose.
Recently arrested for DUI
We don't have a mayor, we have a first selectman. She's a woman but still calls herself first selectman. I can't decide of that's anti-feminist or feminist AF, it is her choice after all
Our mayor has been a mixed bag. He has been fairly progressive in terms of improving public infrastructure, but has had a poor track record on social issues.
Currently, he is courting a scandal involving a violent altercation at a safe injection site where someone got bludgeoned to death. His response was a rather draconian closing of the facility (he claims it's only temporary) and essentially telling the homeless in the area to get lost. As you might imagine, this is not going well.
I have no interest in running for any political office, though if I did, the city council would likely be highest on my list. I actually enjoy watching them in session from time to time on the local cable channel, as there is less partisan bickering at the municipal level and, as you say, the decisions they make are more likely to affect your day-to-day life.
I am sort of half-heartedly angling to get on a committee involving the city's cycling infrastructure, but that's about the extent of any political ambitions.
My city's most recent mayoral election is arguably a better argument for FPTP sucking than US presidential elections. The progressives were split between two candidates so we got the moderate, who's pro-car in a city where people move for walkability and is painfully clearly trying to get an inroads to national politics.
It's better than the nearby, bigger city though. SHEESH.
Good people do not, as a rule, seek personal power for themselves, and a drive to do so is a prerequisite for seeking public office. The result is that the best you can hope for in electoral politics is a psychopath who shares your values, because they are all psychopaths, and most of them don’t see the rest of us as human, much less their equals.
Our mayor doesn’t even live in the same state, if that tells you anything.
One of the bigger cities in Germany.
We have a mayor for our district, who is basically a blank slate to 95% of people. It doesn't help that he lives together with his family in a different district. He is a member of one of our political parties and specifically one I don't particularly like.
For some reason I was in the same school class with his son, who was pretty chill, but got very annoying when it came to politics (of course).
So basically the mayor does a lot of city management stuff but the average person has no clue who he is or what exactly he does.
I would imagine that's very unique compared to most other countries but I'm not sure.
I prefer the council/manager scene myself, although that's probably less common.
I'm close enough to the people in charge that it would be unnecessary, I already can ask certain things. Once oversaw a guy being run out of our slice of life, twice, when in every other area his malice has been supported.
What is a mayor?
A former ice hockey magnate. Very much a boomer. People either like him or dislike him for his antics.
Currently driving through a change in policy that would disallow closing streets for construction. Which is a good thing because the city has been too lax in this regard.
Most people are generally happy with our town, so the mayor gets a lot of automatic support. She's good at the gladhanding and baby kissing - shows up to all the local events at schools and parks and stuff. She always has an opponent but I don't think she's too worried.