this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
180 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
2797 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perfect, just in time to stop Russia from meddling with the 2016 election!

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

~~2016~~
~~2020~~
2024! 🤞

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are we still acting like Fox News is not the same?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. Fox News isn't state owned
  2. Fox News has argued in court its entertainment, you're a sucker for believing their crap, and they've won

That said, yeah its quite the hypocrisy.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

State owned is not worse than private owned, when the private owned company have obvious political agendas.

Especially in democracies.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're just better at hiding it.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, yeah! It was settled in court that they're strictly an entertainment company. It's the most-watched cable entertainment station that just likes to riff on the news ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they are. They're not the ones getting banned, because they maintain an air of plausible deniability.

Not saying they don't deserve to be banned, but they're not overt Russian propaganda—simply the regular, alt-right Conservative kind, and apparently Facebook is totally fine with that.

[–] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Great, now Putin will have absolutely no way whatsoever to spread his propaganda on Facebook!

1000060813

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lots of negativity and whataboutism in this thread (which I don’t disagree with), but this is still a good move.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Perfect, just in time to stop Russia from meddling with the 2016 election!

Great, now Putin will have absolutely no way whatsoever to spread his propaganda on Facebook!

I really struggle to see the point of these comments. It's a valid criticism to say it should've been done sooner or they should've done more, but doing something is better than doing nothing and also better late than never. So what are these commentors trying to achieve here other than applause and upvotes? This is one of the things my autistic brain has a hard time figuring out about social media. Is it just to say what's popular so people come and pat you on the back?

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Or just talk to people? You don't really need a reason to share your thoughts and talk about things. That's the whole point of social media. I get that not everyone wants it that way but some including me do like it.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Probably right after the election.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Zionism, like any form of fascism, can't exist without completely silencing alternatives.