this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
23 points (84.8% liked)

Fuck AI

1180 readers
132 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I write about Tim Boucher, desperate Ai-enthusiast crying into his fists, "I'm an author! I'm an author!"

https://nova.mkultra.monster/tech/2024/09/13/ai-does-not-an-author-make

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, I'm sure that article is very interesting, but I couldn't get past the kerning after a while. It just was too distracting.

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Firefox reader mode to the rescue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Thank you! I have never used it before!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

To my shame, many of my friends are Chrome users.

If my efforts to correct them continue to be unsuccessful, they may never know the joy of reader mode. It's truly sad.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There's an interesting thing there about the legitimacy of the artist.

Most artists and creative I know are rather comfortable with people disagreeing with them and the value of what they make because they understand the value of it to themselves.

I'm an artist and that happens because I make art, not because someone bestows the title on me.

I think the AI crowd is touchy because they dont get that. What joy is there when it is made for you? A prompt is not craft.

I think the main condition here is that he wants to be seen as a writer when he doesn't write. He could legitimately call himself a storyteller, or someone who crafts narratives, but that isn't legitimate for him. Instead he needs the validation of a title he doesn't deserve.

I also wonder how he deals with criticism of the product. If someone reviewing his books calls the language clumsy, does he see that as his failure as a writer or the failure of the AI. The fact he will have to confront that is fascinating.

It isn't my painting that sucks, it is the image I copied it from.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's not a writer, he's an editor. And there's nothing wrong with that, crafting ai output into a coherent and competent output is a task, I'm sure. However, I think calling the role a writer is a step too far.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Absolutely agree. Or at least, if he wants to call himself that he can't be upset if people disagree.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Recently started writing fiction and you gave me an idea, not sure how, but you prompted me.

I was thinking on how disgusted I would be with myself trying to "write" fiction with AI. But then I thought, what if I used it to spur ideas, not for compiling the text?

For example, I have a good start on a story, no idea where it's going, but had to get the first bit down. Figured the next part would jump on me at some point. Creativity is often like that. A young woman has done our narrator wrong, horribly so. What did she do? I'm sure it has something to do with sex, but I'm stumped. AI might kick my imagination in gear. Hmmm...