this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
417 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
6207 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Within moments of Tuesday night's debate ending, Trump began to suggest that he wasn't interested in another face-to-face with Harris.

Donald Trump, who tried to push Kamala Harris into debating him by publicly accepting multiple invitations while her campaign insisted on first negotiating the terms, is now casting doubt on whether he will agree to another face-to-face meeting with his Democratic opponent.

Within moments of leaving the debate stage on Tuesday night with a performance that some Republicans were quick to pan, Trump began dismissing the idea he would participate in another debate — a reversal from his previous talking point that he was willing to do several debates and it was Harris who was hiding.

Trump’s campaign said before the debate that he had already accepted debate invitations from Fox News and NBC News, and that Harris had not. But in post-debate interviews, Trump was noncommittal. He claimed victory on Truth Social, saying, “Why would I do a Rematch?”

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't blame him, didn't you see how mean she was to him last night!?

She kept making him say wrong things, stupid things, lies, and bumbling rants by letting him talk!!!

What a fucking meanie poopoo-head Kamala was by letting Trump be a moron out loud. She cheated!

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Chicken attaAaAAaack

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This guy is so transparent it would be hilarious if he wasn't so god damned dangerous.

He'd be doing us all a huge favor to disappear and shut up until the election, honestly.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh no, I think he should talk more. His dementia has reached an alarmingly obvious stage.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I'm with you. If everyone in the country could get to know Trump personally, he would get fewer votes than he has immediate family members. The best thing he can do for Harris is to go out there and be himself in public.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm enjoying the fact that, weeks ago, he tried to say she had scheduled some and her campaign's response was "we'll see how the first one goes". Which now can be read as "Maybe baby won't wanna play any more after we kick him in the nuts."

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sure they now regret not scheduling a second one so he has to actually pull out

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah. How much worse would it be if they had a NBC one setup in 3 weeks only for him to cancel it.

I'm sure it would be something stupid like arguing over the rules too.

No fact checking!!

[–] teft@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Coo-coo-ca-cha! Coo-coo-ca-cha!

[–] hexabs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Koka koka kocka a ko.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 32 points 1 month ago

One was enough. Harris embarrassed him (or, more accurately, she let him embarrass himself). If he had any backbone or self control, he’d want a second chance. If he wants to let Harris focus on other things while he ends the debate phase on a low note, that’s fine with me.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I had the best debate in the history of debating. Many people, tears in Their Eyes said Sir that Was a Perfect and Beuatiful Debate. Maybe I can Beat Perfection? It was Rigged and she had the answers, and I still Had a Perfect Debate. Should I do Another Debate, we will See, but let me tell you, The Crowd outside of The debate was Tremendous. They were all holding Trump Sigmas.

-@RealDonaldTrump

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Elections are rigged, the DOJ is rigged, the debate is rigged. It's never his fault.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Definitely read that in Seth Meyers' impression

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 25 points 1 month ago
[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did anyone expect any different? Bragging like he'd already won before, making an ass out of himself during, downplaying it after. That's par for the course with Trump. It's how he dealt with every single one of his court hearings as well.

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Off topic, but I love your username. Dream Theater rules!

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And your comment is under Peruvian_Skies

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Well call me Vanessa because I’m going to wait! (But not regretfully.)

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks, people don't usuallt recognize it! They're one of my favorite bands.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Use his full name from now on:

Donald "The Coward" Trump

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Don't disrespect the San Diego Chicken with comparisons to Trump

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She can easily bait him into another debate by talking about how small the crowds cheering for him were. I'm sure Grandpa will come running to tell us about his wholesome stories of transgender aliens performing surgeries on American cats and dogs.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

immigration officers performing gender surgeries on cats and dogs eater aliens

[–] notsure@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

After he went in to the spin room looking as lost as an abandoned puppy...

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I trust someone who's better with puns and all the latest politics than I to do it justice, but I feel like there's a rendition of "Brave Sir Robin" as "Brave Sir Orange" that could be quite good.

[–] MelodiousFunk 5 points 1 month ago

Craven old Sir Orange
Rode forth from Florida
He was not afraid to lie
Craven Sir Orange
He was not all afraid to be nasty in his ways
Craven, craven Sir Orange

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Two pump chump with failing stamina and a refractory period longer than the expected lifespan. We’re done with the shitgibbon…

[–] Spazz@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

Trump says shit all the time that he doesn't mean. He'll probably lie and say he never asked for more debates, then go and whine at his rallies that Harris refuses to debate him more