UraniumBlazer

joined 1 year ago
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 9 points 3 hours ago

Individual Spartans didn't have slaves (like other nations, where individuals owned slaves). Instead, the Spartan military state owned all slaves called "Helots". So yeah, the movie 300 is very far from reality.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 20 points 3 hours ago (5 children)

Trying to approach you in good faith here.

Why downvote? It's just a joke, right? No one's promoting Christianity here.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

We were taught mx+b and ß0 + ß1x

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Le Frenchman

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Exactly, which is why they're doing performative shit like this

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have planned on not running as well.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 35 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Problem: Higher childhood depression rates linked to social media usage, social media caused disruption in education (like usage in schools), privacy violation of minors, etc.

An enforceable, common sense solution: Very strict privacy protection laws, that would end up protecting everybody, including minors. Better, kid friendly urban infrastructure like dedicated bike paths protected from car traffic, better pedestrian areas, parks and so on. Kids will get outside their house if there is a kid friendly outside. A greener, more human friendly outside where you can socialize with other humans would always be preferred over doom scrolling online. For the disruption in education issue, it is very education system dependent.

What solution these people came up with: Make it illegal for individuals under the age of 16 to create social media accounts. How do they enforce this? No idea. Does this solve any of the above problems? No. Is this performative? Yes.

Speaking from personal experience, social media was one of the most liberating tools for me as a kid. I lived in a shitty, conservative country and was gay. Social media told me that I wasn't disgusting. I was always more of a lurker than a poster, so I thankfully didn't really experience being contacted by groomers and so on. However, many of my friends who posted their images and stuff almost always got pedos in their DMs, so that's a very real issue.

I could ask my silly little questions related to astrophysics on Reddit and get really good answers. Noone around me irl was ever interested/able to talk about stuff like this. I could explore different political ideologies, get into related servers on Discord and learn more about this. None of this was possible without social media.

Banning social media outright is such a boomer move lol. Doing so isn't going to solve any real problems associated with childhood social media usage. It's just going to give the jackass parents complaining about this a false sense of security, when the kids still end up suffering.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No. U look wise

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's what Indian news sites look like lol. As for credibility, almost none of them really meet the mark (including the ones unsympathetic to the Modi government).

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

@kittykittycatboys@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Sin tax

That's excise tax tho.

Income taxes have this feature as well. Deductions and credits are ways the government encourages certain economic activity without mandating it.

Yeah, I can see how sales taxes can be a lot better to do this job than income taxes haha.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Companies themselves consume but don’t give any income tax.

Won't their owners be the ones paying income tax though? (Aaaaah, but what happens when the owners reside outside the jurisdiction of the government? So a sales tax is more like a revenue tax for businesses).

make income tax higher instead and you increase wealth gap even further (non income earnings are rewarded more)

Aren't non income earners poor people though? Non income earners benefiting here would lead to a decrease in the wealth gap, no? As for the capitalists who earn very little income and instead increase their wealth through asset appreciation, you could huge progressive capital gains, no?

 

Income taxes can be made progressive. Sales taxes are almost always regressive. Businesses need to do a lot more paperwork to document these taxes.

Why don't leftist parties campaign to abolish sales taxes and replace the lost revenue with an increase in a progressive income tax?

Am I missing some critical functionality of sales taxes that income taxes cannot replicate?


Edit: Here's an important feature of sales taxes that a few commentators helped me realize. It's better if we think of a sales tax as a "revenue tax" instead. Let's say we are in a country with multiple provinces. A business sells stuff in province A. However, the business and its owners are both located in province B. If sales tax didn't exist, then all money earned by the business would go to province B's government. Province A cannot enact tariffs and stuff like that. Thus, it puts up a "revenue tax" that is taxed to business for all revenue earned, i.e., a sales tax.

For those wondering, no, a corporate tax is not a revenue tax. It's a tax on profit. Non profits for example, do not pay any corporate tax, but they do pay sales tax (which is basically, revenue tax).

 

I'm sure Lemmy will downvote this to hell, but o3 really is a big big deal. This benchmark was considered to be incredibly difficult to solve. It was highly unexpected that any AI system would meet the performance criteria at least for a few years.

The flip side however, is that o3 is veeeeery expensive to run. It also is not open source. That's why, it hasn't won the Arc prize- which has performance, efficiency and open source requirements. o3 has met the performance requirements for now, which is still very very impressive.

I would recommend giving the article a read to understand and appreciate what this is actually about.

Also, just a little note - We should fight to seize the means of production. We should not fight the means of production itself.

 

I was bored, so told AI to generate satirical tankie rap. It kinda slaps lol.

(I know I know it's AI generated, but it's still funny...)

 

TWAT TWAT

 

Saw the results of the American elections today. I'm not American, but was following them very closely due to the impact they have on the world. The results went in a way that would make up my worst nightmares.

I was incredibly depressed and angry. I think almost everyone here shares the same sentiment. The next four years are very likely going to incredibly dark for everyone. Entire countries will likely fall to imperialist neighbors. Climate change will worsen. Zooming in to the US, disabled and queer folk will have an incredibly hard time now. More women will die due to abortion inaccessibility. It is very likely that people with preexisting conditions lose their insurance, thus increasing overall suffering and deaths. As I said, a very dark four years lie ahead for the world and Americans, both. Therefore, being depressed right now is absolutely valid.

I think there's a lesson that I learnt here. I spent a lot of time and energy on something that simply wasn't in my control. I am neither American, nor do I own news channels to broadcast propaganda suitable for my hoped outcome. Instead, I could've spent my time on other things, that are in my control, and would make the world a better place. Maybe adopting this mindset could help us?

Listen, I'm not saying that we should just all disconnect from politics. Not at all. All that I'm saying is that we probably should focus more on things in our control now. When elections come, vote. If the government is doing something stupid, go out and protest. Work on your little side project. Work on whatever it is you want to work on. Just try not to doomscroll social media. Doing that would just make you feel depressed and not end up helping anyone.

Therefore, here is what I've planned on doing now. Maybe you guys could find it useful, or maybe not.

  • Only participate in politics that is in my control.
  • Focus solely on my projects.
  • Block all social media posts that talk about depressing/angering topics that I have no control over. I only use YouTube and Lemmy, so doing this is easy for me. On Lemmy, I have put keywords like, "Trump", "Harris", "Elon" and so on in my post filter. I also unsubscribed from all political channels that talk about politics that I have no control over.

As for the Americans who are going to suffer due to a Trump presidency, I am sorry that there are so many stupid people in your country. I'm sure you tried your best. Millions of American showed up to vote against Trump. So many participated in canvassing and so on. So many working class folk donated money to the Harris campaign. Money, that they could've spent on other necessities. You don't deserve this outcome.

However, the election is over. Trump has won. Doomscrolling social media is not going to help anyone. It's a bad outcome, but it is very likely not the end of the world. I don't think it needs to be said, but still- there's a lot more to life than politics. Just because a person that you wanted to win didn't win, it doesn't mean that you can't make the world a better place yourself. Grieve today and wake up tomorrow to focus on a project that you have control over.

AND PLEASE DON'T DOOMSCROLL.

 
 

Original Post

Original Creator

Cheeto likes his big man and wants to spend more time with him 🐆🥰 They make a good couple. After all, they often share single braincell together ~

107
Hmmmm??? (lemm.ee)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee to c/furry@pawb.social
 
view more: next ›