this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
416 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump isn’t an icon of positive masculinity. He also did very little for young men during his four years as president

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 98 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The US will get the leader they deserve.

Too bad the rest of the world will feel the consequences as well while they have no say in the matter.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 126 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Nor does half the country. I just don't understand why trump appeals to young men at all. He's just some horrifically uncool geezer.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 86 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Because all of the aggrieved male content on yt, TikTok, podcasts, etc. There's an entire normie-to-nazi pipeline ffs, and the social media algorithms continually promote stuff that's just slightly more "edgy", and suddenly kids have gone from Joe Rogan to Andrew Tate. Because all of the white males behind social media - spez, Zuckerberg, Musk, etc - agree with that content and continue to find excuses to "free speech" it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Those boys should put in more work getting laid. And that's only a partial joke.

The incel thing drags them in, step 1 into the pipe. The can't get laid, must be something going on they can't put their finger on, but that thing is damned sure someone else's fault.

"I'm white, OK looking and I'm a nice guy!" The unspoken question, the unthought question, is, "What happened to my privilege?" For past generations, life seemed to work out well enough for white guys, but it sure as hell isn't working out for me!

Demographic shift has been wild in my lifetime. Too young to have experienced this, they get a feeling that something nebulous has changed, for the worse. They see minorities of all stripes stepping onto a more level playing field and then tune into YouTubers saying, "Yes! Now you get it! The other is the thing you didn't realize was holding you down!" Well god damn, now it all makes sense!

Back to getting laid, the fun part. Nothing like a good screw to smooth those rejected feels. You're wanted, wanted as a man. But if they think going hard-right is going to land them some pussy, oh boy... The few women in that scene are strictly for the alphas! Your beta ass won't even get scraps.

Dated quite a bit couple of years back. That was an education. Few women had political statements in their profiles, but many wrote something akin to, "I'm not interested in politics.", often followed by a lovey, flowery sentence to lighten the mood. Men: This is code for, "Don't come at me with your Trump bullshit." Yes, apparently guys often pull that horsepucky on the first date. These woman are screening for conservatives, they ain't gonna hear it. Talking on the phone to a potential date (who I ended up dating for a few months!),

"(laughing) Yeah, I'm a bit of a redneck."

Silence. Wrong thing to say there, buckaroo.

"...uh, just how redneck?"

"I loathe Trump if that's what you're getting at."

"Oh, whew! Just checking, can't be too careful these days."

tl;dr: We need to get the word out to these young men, "This crap you're watching is anathema to getting laid."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 61 points 3 months ago

They are Nazis, treat them as such.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Look at 99% of media before 2001 AD. White male hero. Star Trek TOS was a giant ground breaker showing Uhura, but all the real critical leaders were males. Think on this; the James Bond movie Thunderball has a scene that's pretty much rape; they were selling little kids' toys based on that movie. There's a John Wayne movie where Wayne throws someone else's kid into a river to teach the boy how to get over his fear of water.

This is what these young men and their fathers consume. And Trump plays to that. He's a macho hero who plays by his own rules and doesn't take crap from anyone.

Muhammed Ali did more in real life than Clint Eastwood ever did in all his movies put together; guess which one these folks admire?

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No offense, but I'd safely bet maybe 0.1% of current generation young men have watched any of those movies. This article is primarily talking about younger Gen Z folks (18-30), so people born 1994-2006. These males specifically consume idiot social media personalities vs old school macho man movies from the 50s and 60s.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

^ This. I think even older people have scaled back on watching such fare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

This is what these young men and their fathers consume. And Trump plays to that. He’s a macho hero who plays by his own rules and doesn’t take crap from anyone.

How the fuck do they think Trump is macho?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Because he has money, he can say whatever the fuck he wants and no woman can boss him. Kind of like Elon. If you have a broken brain, that is "macho".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm a zoomed so I can confirm you completely failed to bring up any media relevant to Gen Z, and Star Trek TOS and Ali are closer than Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, and Bond.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (8 children)

You’re not paying enough attention if you think Trump winning means “too bad the rest of the world will feel the consequences.” Germany just elected their first far right government since WWII, France had a massive right wing that is now in the EU council, Austria… well they keep making shitty right wing choices, down into South America Argentina shifted right, and other countries continue to do so as well. We’re not special or alone in this.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 3 months ago

I vote my hardest but my brothers are stupid.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (12 children)

I get this way of thinking, but just to be clear: the US didn't get the leader it deserved when Trump "won" the first time, despite receiving millions of fewer votes than Hilary. And almost certainly here, even if Trump "wins," he will have gotten less votes.

That's because there is a 2-3% bias in the current presidential electoral system, the Electoral College. We're founded under a "1 person, 1 vote" ideology that our elections ignore.

So yes, I get the frustration. But we (the sane people) are all in this together, and the majority of voters in the US appear to still be sane, even if that doesn't win the election by default. Solidarity would be the better move here.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Trump did very little for anyone. Unless you’re rich.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even then it's not like it was intentional. He only did it for himself, it's just that other rich people also coincidentally benefited.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Yeah Trump is very simple - he punishes anyone who doesn't actively support him and rewards anyone who does. Anything he does for anybody is simply to show others that if you're good to Trump, he'll throw you a bone too.

He spends so much time performing for his base to ensure he has enough political power for that system to work. Once his base gets bored of him he'll be nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 64 points 3 months ago
[–] Kroxx@lemm.ee 41 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Every gen Z kid I know is having an issue trying to pick a pro-Palestine candidate. They seem to dislike Biden more than Harris, but I have never heard of trump support. I'm sure some amount of gen Z are trumpers but they are a minority, saying young male voters are "flocking" to trump is pretty silly. "There are literally dozens of us!"

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago (8 children)

You should educate them on the dangers of single-issue voting. Pro-life has kept the Republican Party afloat for decades.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I hate to say this, but you're probably living in a bit of a bubble. I know I was.

A lot of men, across all age ranges, tend to lean fascist. There's a lot of reasons for this, but the core problem is that progressive neoliberalism does a terrible job speaking to cis-het male anxieties, while fascism welcomes them with open arms.

It's all bullshit, of course, but at least they're being heard.

Progressive politicians really need to let the 1990s go. Third-way triangulation worked great then, but it's ineffective now.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This exactly. The destruction of third spaces under Reagan was either a genius move to radicalize lonely, isolated Americans or a hell of a coincidence that ended up helping the right.

I say it could be a coincidence because idk if Reagan's administration was looking quite that far ahead but... They were crafty and very intelligent people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finder585@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

progressive neoliberalism does a terrible job speaking to cis-het male anxieties

Terrible is a bit of an understatement. Men complain about bleak social and economic prospects only to be meet with insults that go right to the metaphorical jugular of every mans ego.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah people are too uneducated to vote what is actually good for them, but that is unfortunately by design nowadays.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's not just the uneducated. There are many young men who want women to become property because they're too goony to find one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The article completely missed the core reason for young men to vote for Trump. It's ending DEI initiatives.

That's a single issue for some of my conservative friends. The D's will never get their vote.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A spectacular victory for the billionaire class that your friends are focused on the one black kid who gets a leg up and not the legions of white kids who got ahead through their parents' donations and legacy admissions.

LBJ once said: "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." Clearly, 60 years on, it's still true.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

In the UK the Conservative party decided to get rid of DEI initiatives in education. When?

When the minority specifically recommended to be targeted for support became poor/working class white boys.

Conservatives will go out of their way to harm the working class because as long as things are going badly for them they'll be angry enough to vote for the ones with dog whistles pretending it's someone else's fault.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I guess they are just going to have to accept that diversity equity and inclusion are a part of our lives now, and that they don’t get to make decisions about who is included, and that diverse opinions really are valuable, and that we are going to continue spending our public resources to ensure we all have equitable opportunity.

I guess what I mean is, too bad for your conservative friends?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

I don't think Trump has the interest of literally any of his voters at heart. He's only interested in helping himself and he legally can't even vote for himself.

Edit: TIL Trump can still vote.

Florida (Trump's home state) Law:

a felony conviction in another state makes a person ineligible to vote in Florida only if the conviction would make the person ineligible to vote in the state where the person was convicted.

New York (State of felony convictions) Law:

a person convicted of a felony is disenfranchised only while incarcerated for that felony.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/can-trump-vote-now-he-has-felony-convictions

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rodbiren@midwest.social 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

My take is that they vote for him because he is angry. These young men are largely angry and have had media of all sorts telling them that they should be. They don't want someone telling them how they will boost the middle class and have equitable tax. They want someone who says they will burn every problem to the ground and break things. They want someone screaming at someone to blame.

Why we have a huge chunk of young men desperatly angry is a choose your own adventure of societal issues where we have provided almost no healthy outlet for healthy aggression or the physicality that comes with being a young man. Everyone is free to come up with their own reasons, but for me it is the lack of outlet or the feeling of societial participation for young men.

Whatever the reason, a culture who sweeps the problems of frustrated young men under the rug for long enough I feel will live to regret it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right-wing incels, hot off their carnivore diet, roids, and worship of Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson wondering why women flee from them and yet continue to double-down on the likes of worshiping shitheads like Trump and Andrew Tate.

It's the exploitation of the ignorant and vulnerable; naturally, right-wing puppeteers are telling them it's everyone else who is the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think a lot of it is because there's so many more well-funded right-wing influencers/grifters than genuine liberal or left-wing influencers. It's much more profitable to take advantage of young men's anxieties and insecurities (to sell fungus pills, get-rich-quick plans, or whatever), than to genuinely discuss things from a liberal or especially left-wing perspective.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Its a cliche but they also promise easy answers to hard questions, blame others for problems they caused themselves or at least did nothing to get out of. The old tell 'em what they want to hear rather than what they need to hear.

[–] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 22 points 3 months ago

Don’t forget the E-girls, Trump is also aiming for the E-girls since the loser Gooner boys who are basically privileged Republikids oogle over them constantly.

Losers all of them but they got voting power.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He isn't even masculine. Like not even close.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 3 months ago

yeah im like. positive maculinity? I mean im positive that is not masculinity.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Is their interest racism? Because he's got that covered.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dramaking37@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This seems like the education gap rather than a gender gap. Women have been going to college in greater numbers for a couple of decades.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He does have an interest in young girls at heart though... Just like his good friend Jeff Epstein, “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Floating_head@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He's the most masculine. Many have said that he is the most masculine, ever. He has some friends that also consider themselves to be the most masculine, but secretly they all agree that he is in fact the most masculine, ever.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Scared little boys need a daddy

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago

And somebody to hate. It's so ugly how young men easily come together to hate a person or group. It gives them a sense of togetherness and 'not it' at the same time.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›