this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
416 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump isn’t an icon of positive masculinity. He also did very little for young men during his four years as president

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (5 children)

The article completely missed the core reason for young men to vote for Trump. It's ending DEI initiatives.

That's a single issue for some of my conservative friends. The D's will never get their vote.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A spectacular victory for the billionaire class that your friends are focused on the one black kid who gets a leg up and not the legions of white kids who got ahead through their parents' donations and legacy admissions.

LBJ once said: "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you." Clearly, 60 years on, it's still true.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"But what about rich white kids"

Yeah, a great argument...

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They're rich, thus will heavily benefit from the tax breaks.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

In the UK the Conservative party decided to get rid of DEI initiatives in education. When?

When the minority specifically recommended to be targeted for support became poor/working class white boys.

Conservatives will go out of their way to harm the working class because as long as things are going badly for them they'll be angry enough to vote for the ones with dog whistles pretending it's someone else's fault.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I guess they are just going to have to accept that diversity equity and inclusion are a part of our lives now, and that they don’t get to make decisions about who is included, and that diverse opinions really are valuable, and that we are going to continue spending our public resources to ensure we all have equitable opportunity.

I guess what I mean is, too bad for your conservative friends?

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Ehh...they'll be the next generation of old bitter men.

[–] qed123@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree. I am supposed to be just peachy with and validate some notion they are discussing this or any matter in good faith, while they are voting to kill my healthcare, prop up Russia, just so they can be racist? While "cleverly" refusing to sincerely discuss anything, adamantly trying to gaslight sincere prople with whatever the Russian propaganda of the hour is?

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It’s ending DEI initiatives.

Name the "endless DEI initiatives" that Harris has been promoting in her platform.

Most of the DEI that people encounter in real life originates from their workplaces. It's being pushed for marketing reasons, or because it's the only way the employer can recruit qualified staff. It's the free market in action. And in my experience, it's the marginal performers who are adversely impacted. The people who are good at their jobs keep their jobs, or quickly find another.

I'm a hiring manager, have been for a very long time. I've got two recruiting campaigns going right now, The field of applicants we interviewed was highly diverse. And the last two offer letters I've sent out were to middle-aged white men. That's because they were the best candidates. And you know what? The DEI Police are not going to come and kick down my front door at 3 AM because of my hiring decisions. DEI is a nonexistent problem, just as "woke," just as the Great Replacement lies, just as the anti-trans hysteria is. The reality is that, if you're not getting offers or someone is being promoted ahead of you, it's because your management think they'll do better than you. Suck less and you'll do better. Nobody in my job assesses me based on DEI compliance. But if I hire people who wash out because they can't do the job, or if I can't retain high performers, my ass is on the line.

And just to declare my own perspective: I'm an able-bodied older white male myself.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Losers are afraid of competition as another older white male the system is still heavily favouring us. People are mistaking equality with discrimination and it's so damn tone deaf.

That said even I bitch about it at time.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

The DEI Police are not going to come and kick down my front door at 3 AM because of my hiring decisions.

Well...I've seen that happen. We had a black guy working for one of my previous employers and no one was really sure what he did. Ends up he was working his second job most days.

When said employer found out and fired him, he walked out with a 6 figure discrimination settlement. It was cheaper to settle than fight.

That cost a couple unrelated people their jobs due to budget.

I'm not pro or anti DEI. I've seen it used for good, and I've seen it abused.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So a "They took our jobs!" kinda thing.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Day tok ma job!