this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
76 points (92.2% liked)

Fuck AI

1173 readers
222 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

If the only reason people care about NaNoWriMo is for the name and hashtag, somebody already pitched Writevember as a replacement. Honestly sounds better to me anyway.

I've heard other people say the tools/gamification/etc on the NaNoWriMo platform were really helpful though. For those people, how difficult would it be to potentially patch that stuff into the WriteFreely platform? As one of the only long-form Fediverse-native platforms still being actively developed, maybe they'd appreciate the boost in code contributions.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Um, question?

Did an organization which has a sole stated purpose of getting people to write something actually say that requiring someone to actually write something is ableist?

AI isn't writing any more than my dog taking a shit and then scooting her butt around on the carpet is modern art.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Honestly, your dog has a better chance of actually making you money than this AI shit these companies are trying to jam down our throats.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let me guess - their marketing strategy is to be deliberately provocative to get clickbait coverage?

[–] WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From what I heard a hostile take over of the non profit occurred driving out most of the long term staff. This is probably the result of that. Someone deciding you need to shake it up and modernize it

[–] Evinceo@awful.systems 1 points 1 week ago

Do you have an article about this?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

So AI is now considered both a disabled and protected class?

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 week ago

Wow! NaNoWriMo somehow managed to make itself even less relevant than it already was.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly sounds better to me anyway.

You think so? It sounds really forced to me. "Novelvember" might work.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

The first time I heard NaNoWriMo mentioned I had no idea what they were talking about.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Novelvember” might work.

Now Novel November.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

No Novel November

[–] forrcaho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The headline is inaccurate; what's being referred to is this part of a statement from NaNoWriMo on the use of AI:

We also want to be clear in our belief that the categorical condemnation of Artificial Intelligence has classist and ableist undertones, and that questions around the use of AI tie to questions around privilege (source)

That's plenty bad enough, no need to embellish it.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 week ago

The way to spot that this is bullshit is trivial: replace "AI/Artificial Intelligence" with "ghost writer".

We also want to be clear in our belief that the categorical condemnation of the use of a ghost writer has classist and ableist undertones, and that questions around the use of ghost writers tie to questions around privilege.

Because ... unless they accept ghost-written submissions their acceptance of AI (which is just bad ghost writing by a madlibs machine) is hypocritical bullshit.