this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
259 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18852 readers
5242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 72 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Wait until they unleash the Power of Tim.

Edit:

OMG He brought up the JD couch fucking thing 🤣 🤣

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

Won't matter if we don't vote. Trust no poll.

[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

I hate to lose our governor, but would love to see what he could do as VP.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is good news, but we cannot get complacent! Plan to vote! And if you are really motivated, try to convince at least one other person to vote!

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago

I love this message. Plan to vote, and plan to help others vote.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

One tip I like is: if you have a car, offer rides to people that don't.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

For those in Minnesota... if you register (re-register? whatever. its the same process), you can sign up to have them automatically send your ballots to you every time there's a relevant election. it's a very-low-key tick box in the process.

it takes five minutes. and it's super easy.

For everyone else, you can get directions on how to confirm your registration here. I would suggest checking now, before you find out that certain groups of asshats tried to have you removed for some strange reason...

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Here are the FiveThirtyEight polling averages this morning:

National: Harris +2

Michigan: Harris +2.1

Wisconsin: Harris +1.6

Pennsylvania: Harris +1.1

Nevada: Harris +0.3

Georgia: Trump +0.7

North Carolina: Trump +1.0

Arizona: Trump +1.9

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago

This train is just getting started, too.

Tune into Philly right now.

The crowd is absolutely LOUD!

Like rock concert loud.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump putting in some rookie numbers there.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe he should get up off of vance's couch?

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

Yep. The fuckwitted GOP and their MSM lackeys boned it by constantly attacking Biden's age. He did the thing that they'd find unthinkable when he bowed out. Now they've unleashed the blue wave they've been fearing all along.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pennsylvania is +1.1 to Harris? That's crazy, it was Trump +4 like a week ago.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It's pretty much of a tie. See what it's like in a couple of weeks.

[–] OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These are the numbers that really matter. I’m actually holding out a little hope that we could turn Texas blue soon, but I’d ask that the Democrat campaign not come here with too much heat, as there are better strategies to win more seats and the presidency.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 12 points 1 month ago

A blue Texas would be a hilarious headache for Republicans.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

+5 is breaking even +8 is a win, due to the electoral college.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s really sad that this is where we are now. She shouldn’t just be “ahead” of him- he shouldn’t even be an option. That there are people ignorant enough to even consider that traitorous criminals a candidate speaks volumes of how broken America is politically. And remember:

VOTE AS IF POLLS DON’T EXIST.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The ONLY thing that matters is the electoral college, and whereas the numbers are moving in the right direction, there is still a LOT of work to do to secure the future of America. VOTE. TAKE YOUR FRIENDS. ASK THEM IF THEY ARE REGISTERED.

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Real clear politics still has trump with 297 electoral votes. Long way to go. I certainly like how things have been trending lately though.

[–] OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yep. Need PA and either AZ or WI to make it work. As Much as RCP doesn’t always show the numbers I personally want, it does seem to have accurate polling.

[–] numberfour002@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Am I missing something? I just checked and it seems like it is currently showing:

Harris 208

Toss Ups 111

Trump/Vance 219

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is what I got. I see the difference. This is with no tossups.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

I don't believe RCP tries to judge pollsters accuracy at all, they just throw it into an average and call it done. So they get flooded by bad rightwing polls and end up saying Republicans are winning while places like 538 say the opposite. The NYT polling averages someone else posted have Harris up in NV, WI, and PA, which flips the race.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago
[–] phase_change@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This poll tracking is showing Harris barely ahead on national polls. This millennium, Republicans have won the presidency in 2000, 2004, and 2016.

In 2000 and 2016, the Democratic candidate won the popular vote.

Winning the popular vote doesn’t mean shit. The electoral college is what matters.

That same NYT poll link lists 9 tossup states: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Minnesota, North Carolina, Nevada, and Virginia.

You’ll notice all but the first three are in alphabetical order. That’s because all but the first three don’t have enough polling to make a prediction. Of those first three: a statistical tie in Wisconsin and Michigan with a Trump lead in Pennsylvania.

If you include Kennedy, Harris is ahead by 1% in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania but still tied in Michigan.

National polling trends are going in the direction I want, but they really don’t matter.

I write this from a state whose electoral college votes have never gone for a Democrat in my lifetime and won’t ever before my death. I’ll be voting for Harris, but that vote is one of those national votes that won’t actually help my preferred candidate.

The only way I can help is via monetary donation.

And if you’re a Harris voter in a solidly blue state, your vote means as much fuck all as mine does. Yes, it actually makes it to the electoral college, but, like mine, that’s a forgone conclusion. You should be donating money too and hoping it’s used wisely to affect those swing states.

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Abortion protections passed in several red states. If everyone votes, you might catch em sleeping.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’ll notice all but the first three are in alphabetical order. That’s because all but the first three don’t have enough polling to make a prediction.

exactly. but in spite of it being so soon that there isn't enough data in some of the states, she already deleted quite big gap she had, so hopefully the trend will continue and will bring some results in states where it matters.

[–] phase_change@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That’s my hope. Still from where I live I can only hope my specie contributions are used to affect that.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Popular vote does tend to correlate with swing state results as elections are pretty nationalised these days. It's just too close at the moment to make a prediction either way (and 2016 was too close to call as well, despite the rhetoric at the time).

If she gets to a 10+ national lead I'd start to feel comfortable. Less that that, and it's a tossup (although a smaller margin starts to become significant closer to the election).

Anyway, vote no matter where you live. If nothing else but to build the habit so it becomes something you don't have to think about.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm rewatching the Pennsylvania speeches...it's like seeing a cancer patient slowly start to beat cancer...there is hope. I wish our politicians in Europe were able to kick this much butt against far-right populists.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Good to see for Harris.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 4 points 1 month ago

How does a college... in New York... poll 40% for Trump?

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/us/elections/polls-president.html?unlocked_article_code=1.A04.l8tT.vVux0eicUc7N
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support