this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1024 points (99.9% liked)

196

16442 readers
2480 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1024
Stock Markrule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 219 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gets huge government grant

Fires 120% of staff

Uses ChatGPT to tweet gospel

Funnels the money into private car collection

Bungie could never compete with this CEO

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why the comparison to Bungie? Just very recently heard of Bungie's CEO being hated by former employees - out of the loop on this one

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 142 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He should have prayed harder over the decision to double down on selling auto immolating products for several years because it was cheaper than fixing the problem

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago (1 children)

His solution to the sell off is mass layoffs, stock buybacks, and r&d cuts.

You know, stuff you need the most when trying to save your business from itself.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A while back, I heard a theory that eventually, Intel will just be a fab producing AMD chips. Thought it was a long shot back then, but now it might be the company's best outcome.

[–] sevan@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That would be a lucky outcome for Intel, they can't compete with AMD's current fab (TSMC).

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Getting away from Global Foundries was such a pivotal move for AMD.

[–] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Intel is supposed to be heading domestic chip production very soon. An Intel failure could have significant national security implications. The fed won't allow them to fail.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] golden_calf@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

AMD has no chip fabs. They use TSMC like most other big chip companies. Intel is one of the few that has their own fabs.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

At least for anti monopoly practices.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 months ago

This is likely already priced in and the reason they aren't completely gone.
What remains of Intel are their foundaries.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What do you mean "heading domestic chip production", Intel already produces chips in Phoenix.

Both tsmc and Intel are building brand new fabs in Phoenix, I can't be bothered to check but I'm pretty sure the capabilities will be pretty matched so they won't be heading or leading still.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

The fabs they own now aren't competitive at the high end. Though I like to point out that this is myopic way of viewing the industry. Not every microcontroller needs TSMC 3nm; they're perfectly happy running them off for tens of pennies per unit on ancient nodes, and those chips go into every little piece of electronics that isn't thought of as a "real" computer. A huge portion of the pandemic supply chain issues (the ones that were actually valid and not just an excuse to raise prices) came from these little chips.

With that caveat in mind, the high end is still important.

The calls of "they took government money and then laid off employees" are off base. That government money is going into specific fab projects. Has nothing to do with the rest of the company. Unless there's some kind of siphoning of funds into the rest of the company (admittedly totally possible, but it needs specific evidence), that's not particularly relevant to Intel's situation.

The company should probably reorganize as strictly a fab and stop making their own stuff. AMD did very well for themselves by ditching their fabs into a separate company--Global Foundries--and then buying manufacturing capabilities from the best fab they could afford. Intel could go the opposite way, with AMD becoming one of their customers.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

Thank you for clearing this up. I work in semi and I can't count how many times I've had to clarify how CHIPS Act and similar funding works.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Intel owns 5/11 of the new US foundries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago

Nationalize it ftw

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

So... Does that mean you're buying the dip?

[–] MaddyMurder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] MaddyMurder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 3 months ago (1 children)

what the fuck? when i posted this comment i was asleep holding my phone, i somehow commented this while asleep

[–] yuri@pawb.social 19 points 3 months ago

that’s why it’s just silence

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're new to the stock market then yes, because it means a discount!

My condolences to retirees who need to live off 401ks with no bonds. Everyone else, wee! Discount time!

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

line go down good? but i spent so long learning that line up good!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Line move is good. Line still bad.

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago

oooh like the bleepy heart thing, damn my business major did not prepare me at all

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Line up good when you have stonk. Line down good when you haven't stonk yet.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago

Line go down means stonks are on sale!

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

These really need to be posted with sauce dates.

Bcs it's funnier if this particular twatt (a post on Twatter) is more than 3 days old.

[–] androogee@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

If you have to explain your joke . . .

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Lowest it has been in 15 years

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago (7 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes all in, take out a reverse mortgage

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do I need the own my home for this to work or can I use my landlords property as collateral?

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

The bigger the hole you can dig yourself into the larger the profit

Rule of acquisition one hundred something

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Huh, I was about to say that can't be right bcs of the overall "economy" growth in that period but yeah, you are right.

[–] Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Company profits up but share price down? Fire some C-Suite.

Company has never profited and there's no plan but share price up? Give C-Suite performance bonuses.

load more comments
view more: next ›