this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
119 points (96.1% liked)

World News

32286 readers
844 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] filoria@lemmy.ml 71 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IMF: your housing market is collapsing

China: yeah we know

IMF: so how about you bail out those poor housing investors

China: ...no thanks

IMF: surprised Pikachu

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Why subject your self and enslave yourself to the IMF?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

China rescues people, not investors. 😏

[–] protist@mander.xyz 20 points 3 months ago (5 children)

That's quite a fantasy you're telling yourself. A huge portion of China's people's wealth is wrapped up in real estate, and tens of millions of stalled residential units have already been purchased by the Chinese people, and that money is now gone, taken by the developers.

The IMF recommendation here was "to deploy 'one-off' fiscal resources to complete and deliver pre-sold properties or compensate homebuyers." That would literally be rescuing the Chinese people who were burned by developers. Instead, the Chinese government is supporting the tech and manufacturing industries. Don't pretend like China is some paradise where the common people aren't getting fucked

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

Don’t pretend like China is some paradise where the common people aren’t getting fucked

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh no! The millionaire is now not a billionaire... And the developer was sentenced to life in prison.

Anyway...

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is a family spending their money on an apartment they now won’t receive “a millionaire that is not a billionaire”? Not to mention, China loves billionaires. They have more of them than the US. It’s a fascistic shithole.

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Why are you lying? They bailed out buyers. And no it's not. Are you a fed? https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

I don't know enough about this specific situation. But the history of the IMF and World Bank is such that, if they were to put out a statement saying that the sky is blue, I would immediately go and check if it had somehow changed colour.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Don't pretend like the average person in China is a fucking real-estate investor. This investment money is from the middle class and up i.e. people who don't need to be rescued. They're going to be fine. Even if their investments all go up in smoke, they won't be homeless. Common people just spend their paychecks and keep a little aside for savings, like everywhere else in the world.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

My understanding is many everyday Chinese people bought real estate that wasn't yet built because demand was so high. Supposedly many of them sunk their whole life savings into units that developers had promised to build at some future point. That point seems unlikely to come if those developers go bankrupt, meaning that some decently large number of everyday people are going to lose their life savings.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My understanding is middle class Chinese people bought real estate because they wanted passive income from investing in real-estate. China shouldn't have allowed them to do that but the solution isn't to bail out these developers. The actual solution is to make sure these people do not end up destitute because they wasted their money on gambling.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

it was basically the only kind of investment allowed in china.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's call investnent risk that investors bears why should their losses be subsidized via loans on entire taxpayers?

Ironic how China is more less interventionist than US now where we bail out the owner class every single time

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, so the people who saved up to buy a home that couldn't be built until later due to demand are now investors?

I don't think they owned any stock in a company.

They had contracts for homes, right?

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Real estate is an asset class just like any other asset that is traded.

With respect to them giving money unfront for building, they got scammed. It is a criminal matter. But why should other people socialize their bad choices.

Bail out mechinsm done in the west is the most retarded way to deal with these issues and it creates incentives for owner class to scam taxpayers.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

So you are saying anyone who has a mortgage is the "investor class."

Got it. Think we are done here.

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IMF: Imperialist Monetary Fund

[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 1 points 3 months ago

Impossible Mission Force

[–] Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

If it was my country's government, they would have accepted it without a second thought and the people have no say about it.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Isn't the rate of homeownership like 95%? Seems like a tough market.