How would you expect to recreate them when the models are given random perturbations such that the results usually vary?
What about it? It has to happen sometime. Sentencing, as far as I know, often comes a while after a trial is decided, especially if it's a big trial with a lot of arguments.
You can't have it both ways: if they sentenced right now there would be complaints that there wasn't enough time and diligence given. If they wait, it gets close conventions, if they wait too long, that's not speedy due process.
Can we stop with the idea that it's all red vs. all blue conspiracy and realize that it's the real world where there is always some bullshit involved?
Could I, an American citizen, not trust you to be impartial on a jury? Your red/blue dichotomy is bullshit. If I can't trust you to do your duty as a citizen, are you behaving like an American? Stop making it about sides. Make it about facts and specifics and individuals and holding everyone responsible for their own decisionmaking.
A jury of 12 found him guilty. Not Democrats, not Biden. A jury of 12 American citizens said he is guilty.
He can still appeal and I hope he avails himself of every protection the law allows, as anyone being prosecuted should, but as of today, 12 American citizens found him guilty.
How do you propose such a bill be advanced through the GOP controlled house?
Fined less than $40k. Great, problem fixed, everyone!
An estimated 85-percent of Neuralink’s brain-computer interface (BCI) implant threads connected to the first human patient’s motor cortex are now completely detached and his brain has shifted inside his skull up to three times what the company expected, volunteer Noland Arbaugh told The Wall Street Journal on Monday.
You don't address this claim from the article. You just say they've compensated with software. The fact still seems to be, at least to me based on what I am reading, that the wires have detached and shifted from their intended locations regardless of what effects that has had.
well, A+ for getting kids into Tears for Fears. - Gen Xer
edit: thank you for your front-line reporting 🤣
do your handlers mark you down if you don't post the last word? are you a russian-trained LLM that responds regardless of what is here?
are you just atomically upset that I know Putin is the reason so many Ukrainians and Russians are dying every day?
will we ever know? do I care? 🤷♂️
🇷🇺😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
Google is well known to do A/B testing, meaning you might not get a particular response (or even whole sets of results generated via different algorithms they are testing) even if your neighbor searches for the same thing.
So again, I ask how your anecdotal evidence somehow invalidates other anecdotal evidence? If your evidence isn't anecdotal, I am very interested in your results.
Otherwise, what you're saying has the same or less value than the example.