this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
37 points (91.1% liked)

Ocean Conservation & Tidalpunk

437 readers
27 users here now

A community to discuss news about our oceans & seas, marine conservation, sustainable aquatic tech, and anything related to Tidalpunk - the ocean-centric subgenre of Solarpunk.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But would people still swim in a pool if they could see the wind turbine blade on the bottom? What if it were an L-shaped pool?

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey, most pools have a bunch of wind turbine blades in them, but they're 99% insect turbine blades, so we don't even think twice about it.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

a quality regional news article. thats heartening to see.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Do the components that broke off pose any danger to the environment or humans?

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 10 points 3 months ago

Some, but much less than a similarly catastrophic failure at coal or nuclear power plant or even an offshore oil rig. I only mention that because there will be people who see this article and point and scream that wind turbines are dangerous.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fiberglass chunks shouldnt be an issue in terms of pollution, thats what many boats use, it doesnt dissolve. The foam filling could be nasty but realistically its a drop in the bucket in terms of oceanic plastic pollution. Bathing is probably not gonna happen until the debris is recovered.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, I wonder if you could cut yourself when stepping into fiberglass chunks?

But yeah, since the material is most likely inert, it will probably at most be used as a sort of artificial reef by wild life. For the foam, that's probably also inert. But it likely swims on the surface, so has the same effect as plastic in the great Pacific garbage patch.

Bathing is probably not gonna happen

dats why i wrote this :D

[–] solo 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, that's my understanding. More info and relevant links, can be found in this article.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I read the article and didn't find any hints at actual issues caused by this, only that the beach was closed.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

"abundance of caution" to protect both the people and the project was likely called for.