this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
138 points (85.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29612 readers
1688 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pretty interesting that 4.2% of the world's population generates 25% of the world's GDP. Looking only at the numbers, it's pretty cool, but when you look at the reality of it, it becomes a lot more messy.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Part of it is that America just has an insane amount of resource richness even compared to historical empires of it's comparative influence.

Let me try to explain it in agricultural terms. America is a nation of immigrants, and yet a common phenomenon is an observed disconnect between what Americans consider local cuisine from a given country and what people from that country today consider average cuisine of their culture.

This is because those immigrants were the tired, the poor, the hungry masses yearning to be free. The cuisine they brought was the stuff people would make to subsist as peasants, notice how many different varieties of "take this basic grain as a filler then layer on bitsins and fixins to give it flavor and nutrition." Meanwhile in the home country, cuisine culture continued to be defined by the elites who had already been defining it. What's really interesting is that the cuisine brought by the poor, did not stay pauper meals.

This is because America as a country is so packed to the gills with farmable land that ingredients considered a rarity for sheer cost in "the old country" were abundant to the point of being cheap. American serving sizes are so big because they were pioneered by people who were thanking god that they could be that big. Chop Sui literally was just "whatever you can throw in the pot, serve it up!", tacos and sandwiches were invented basically to maximize the flavor and nutrition of expensive fresh ingredients on limited supply, Pizza has roots as the equivalent of a street pretzel in NYC.

Imagine if someone took the NYC pretzel, moved to a land of unheard-of plenty unseen by human eyes thus far, and decided to spice that pittily ass bread and salt with choice of topping by loading that shit with the most unimaginably luxurious ingredients they could conceive of because that shit is all cheap there. That's the story of Pizza. That's what happened to basically every peasant food culture that made contact with the US and its because American resource richness is just that unprecedented for anyone who isn't from America already to conceive of.

Stalin once stated that WWII was won with, "British Intelligence, American Steel, and Soviet Blood.", but America wasn't just a factory for the world, the American kitchen put into that war just as hard as the American foundry, arguably more, America's first casualties of the war were the merchant marines who faced U-Boats head on to run food aid to the British public and anywhere else they could slip past the Nazis.

We got so much shit we will literally give it to you for free sometimes

That is how 4% of the world population ends up sitting on 25% of its GDP

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I remember hearing that American service members are by far the best fed of all countries since WWII.

Along with resource richness, I think it's important to note how USA's geography also makes it extraordinarily safe from invasion. It is flanked by two oceans with die hard allies as neighbors to the North and South. Anyone that wants to invade USA would have to make an impossible amphibious landing or super-blitz through Canada or Mexico. Both of those options are nearly impossible. The entire world vs North America might not even he able to pull that off. Then, once the invaders get to the continental USA, they would have to deal the most possibly armed insurgency due to the culture's obsession with firearms. So, the only way the USA could be militarily taken over is by near complete destruction of its population via long-range missiles. This disregards the USA's vastly superior military power. The USA has more aircraft carriers than the next 7 countries combined and each one is technologically superior as well.

With that in mind, the USA didn't have to direct considerable economic efforts to protecting its homeland, while knowing that it's economic production would go mostly unharmed. In contrast, the Soviet's were scorching their own production centers just so the enemy wouldn't acquire them.

Additionally, the USA has the most expansive freight rail system and the Mississippi River allows for easy and efficient shipping of resources, especially from the food production area (eg the Bread Basket). So not only can the USA produce lots of food without having to worry much about protecting that, but it can also easily transport the food to other locations efficiently. When it comes to food and defense, the USA is overpowered af.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's an interesting read, but I think it misses a point of where that 25% GDP is really coming from. The US makes 25% of the GDP because they outsource. To use other country's labor, other countries people, other other people's brains, and they take a huge chunk of profit from it. They then claim that's their GDP.

America is a very efficient country, with a lot of skilled workers creating a lot of cool products and stuff, but it's not 5x other countries. The only way to get those numbers is by leveraging the work of other people and claiming it for yourself.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That's not how GDP works

Edit to elaborate, GDP is calculated based on final goods and services, outsourced work exclusively counts towards the GDP of the country that work is done in, and only affects the GDP of another country when they buy what the first country made, but the outsourced work still happens in country A, so country A gets all the GDP created by selling finished goods, and all the GDP of the work done on unfinished products within their borders.

Basically, the US isn't sitting on everyone else's money, it just genuinely makes and sells that much shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NOFF@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But how much of the online world are we?

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

English speaking? Pretty big. There's also vast portions of the internet that are not in English, but if you don't speak anything besides English, chances are you're not going to come across it too much.

[–] sp6@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

English-speaking population is about 1.5 billion worldwide and 300 million of that is in the US (first language or additional language), so the US is about 20% of the world's English speakers. The 2nd and 3rd countries with the most English-speakers are India and Nigeria, so factor in internet access, and the US is almost certainly >20% of the English-speaking internet.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 10 points 4 months ago

I'd like to see stats on that, because there are equally many 2nd language speakers in English speaking spaces as well. Not to mention the brits, irish, aussies, kiwis, canadians, etc, and that's before we get into this list of places with a non majority first language population, like many countries in Africa.

I think the percentage of Americans on the internet will be higher, but still not a majority

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

And 15% of the world’s prisoners.

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (4 children)

And they keep assuming others are American too.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago

It's only polite to assume strangers matter until proven otherwise /s

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It made sense on Reddit, being an American company. I am sure British or Australian social media has a similar assumption. (Please list them below.)

It makes less sense here.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

It was kinda funny when lemmy was just taking in the reddit exodus crowd and people were complaining that their front page was full of German and Polish posts.

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It makes sense, but it hurts. Sometimes I talk about niche Asian stuff and get blasted by people assuming I'm American.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Genuine Skill Issue, how long has the internet been around?

Americans don't assume people online are americans because they're arrogant assholes, they assume because it's been X decades and somehow their 4.2% of the world still dominates the internet.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago (9 children)

They *think they dominate the internet because they only speak one language

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 23 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Yup, I think all y'all in burgerland should recall that once in a while.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t the UK also notorious for assuming it is the center of the world?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We were. Because we were. But those days are very much over.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t be so sure it’s just a “were” thing. You and I may have a more humble view of our homelands but I think we’ve both got to accept that there are some awfully myopic idiots residing in both of our states.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh hell yes. But you get people like that everywhere.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

I(German) can agree(sadly).

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Hahaha.

Nah pommy fucks still act like the Empire exists all the time.

[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That would be the ones that shot us all in the face with brexit

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

At least I can take solace in the fact that Donny never won the popular vote. Still entirely too many fools voting for the obvious wannabe autocrat though

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

Don't really appreciate the pommy remark there skippy

But yea, that happens. I meant the Empires over, not that some people refuse to believe it.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Burgerland? C'mon man! If anything we're bacon double cheeseburgers land!

Just a burger would be like an Englishman eating chips without the vinegar!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm not opposed to being called burgerland, but I'm wondering why burgers and not hot dogs or apple pie. I think we should start referring to all countries by their national food.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

True, as burgers didn't actually originate in the USA anyway. Are there any foods that are 100% USA creations?

[–] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure anyone has original food. Isn't it all just the same stuff in regional flavors with available ingredients? We should just go by what's popular, or perceived to be popular, which i guess does make us burgerland.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And are surprised when the other 95.8 don't understand US Customary Units, but you saw this gag coming from 3 Rhode islands away.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It's funny because Rhode Island is so smol that you need 3 of them to make a mile!

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

How many diet Coke and Big Mac is that?

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Sorry, what's that in hand-egg-ball fields?

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 13 points 4 months ago

Yeah, that's not a showerthought. That's something you remembered in the shower.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But commits 90% of the world's fuckery. I'm 'Murican, I know wut ahm talkin' bout.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, US Americans. You're among friends.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is that possible? Even in America, Americans aren't among friends!

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

You confuse internet and media narratives with reality. We're friendly as fuck as long as you aren't a no tipping poutine eating maple leaf fuckers./s

[–] CPMSP@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago
[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'm actually surprised it's as high as that!

[–] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Obviously the most important part. USA! USA! USA!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

Nice to know I guess

load more comments
view more: next ›