this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1070 points (99.1% liked)

Lefty Memes

4233 readers
622 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You have completely changed the subject. You and the other user said he probably did this on purpose to get food and shelter.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I firmly believe he did. Otherwise he would have stolen more than $100 and wouldn't have turned himself in. A lot of homeless folks at shelters will commit petty theft and turn themselves in if their time is up or if there are no beds left, especially during extreme heat in places like Texas and Louisiana with poor social safety nets.

You're the one that brought up the question of wrongful imprisonment so I spoke to that. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough for you, I was trying to speak to your specific concern.

Yes, he was wrongfully imprisoned no matter the motive. $100 ain't worth that much time, or, honestly, any real time. He was likely looking for a few days to a few weeks of three squares and a cot. Instead he's sitting in the hoosegow for a decade with time off for good behavior which will make it that much harder for him to get out of his situation and, on top of the gross injustice by people who paint themselves as fiscal conservatives, it'll cost more than a properly functioning social safety net would have cost to get him housed, fed and back to being part of society where he could be comfortable.

I have a lot of feelings about this that are hard for me to articulate. There are a lot of subjects to cover here. It starts with how shitty we treat the homeless, moves to what some of the homeless have to do just to survive, and ends with how we're throwing away money just to keep someone down for the rest of their damn life.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It’s possible =/= it happened that way. You have no evidence this was a choice. The reasonable assumption is he did not expect 15 years for $100

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They covered him not expecting 15 years.

He was likely looking for a few days to a few weeks of three squares and a cot.

I don't think anyone expects 15 years over an unarmed robbery of $100 because it's completely disproportionate.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is going to sound like I'm being shitty, but I promise this question is genuine because I really feel like I'm missing something.

Is your issue the original language I used when making the assumption about his motive?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It’s not just the language, it’s assuming his motive period.

I don’t think you sound shitty I’m just a little surprised you two are being so presumptuous.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Then the best thing for us to do is part ways here.

I do believe that's his motivation because I've seen it happen a lot back when I was working in shelters and because he could have gotten more than a hundred bucks if he was robbing a bank if his motivation was money.

However, if you don't think I should be assuming anyone's motivation that's a perfectly reasonable stance. It won't stop me, but I get where you're coming from and I'm glad we talked it out so I could understand.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I promise you this man did not steal $100 to get 15 years in prison on purpose. I appreciate your polite demeanor but it also feels like you’re playing nice while not considering what I’m saying.

Have a good one man.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That may be where our disconnect is. I think he did it to get a couple of days to a couple of weeks. I absolutely do not believe he did it to get 15 years.

I promise that it's not that I'm not considering it, it's that I still feel like I'm missing something. I'm a pretty oblivious guy and that happens sometimes. I don't think you're coming at me with ill intent and I get the feeling that you and I would agree on a whole lot of shit, just not the minutiae here. I don't want to burn a good discussion bridge with someone that seems like a good actor and considerate person.

You have a good one as well, and I genuinely hope we get to have more discussions.