Technology

59038 readers

3862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

579

Windows 3.1 saves the day during CrowdStrike outage — Southwest Airlines scrapes by with archaic OS (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Southwest Airlines, the fourth largest airline in the US, is seemingly unaffected by the problematic CrowdStrike update that caused millions of computers to BSoD (Blue Screen of Death) because it used Windows 3.1. The CrowdStrike issue disrupted operations globally after a faulty update caused newer computers to freeze and stop working, with many prominent institutions, including airports and almost all US airlines, including United, Delta, and American Airlines, needing to stop flights.

Windows 3.1, launched in 1992, is likely not getting any updates. So, when CrowdStrike pushed the faulty update to all its customers, Southwest wasn’t affected (because it didn’t receive an update to begin with).

The airlines affected by the CrowdStrike update had to ground their fleets because many of their background systems refused to operate. These systems could include pilot and fleet scheduling, maintenance records, ticketing, etc. Thankfully, the lousy update did not affect aircraft systems, ensuring that everything airborne remained safe and were always in control of their pilots.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Holy crap, they are serious. I though I was on !programmer_humor@programming.dev for a minute. I sure hope none of those computers are connected to the internet. There's a massive number of vulnerabilities in windows 3.1 and windows 95.

[–] krdo@programming.dev 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Windows 3.1 doesn't even come with a TCP/IP stack. It's actually pretty safe.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As long as that's the exact version they're using. Windows for workgroups 3.11 has networking.

[–] palordrolap@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

Yep. I remember - despite the fact it was old even then - building and connecting a Win 3.11 machine to a TCP/IP office network as a proof of concept back in 2000 or so. I might have even installed Netscape on it. I don't remember clearly now, but I assume the parts for the computer came out of the spares pile, and were soon recycled back into other machines.

[–] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Bold of you to assume any of the "experts" writing about this know what a TCP/IP stack is

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

The "source" is a tweet from a random dude, it's almost certainly not true.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

But how many people are looking for Windows 3.1 anything today?

Well I suppose now there might be more