this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
336 points (83.9% liked)

politics

19239 readers
3190 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Most people engaged in politics have likely made up their mind, and anyone sufficiently disengaged will vote for the incumbent and be done with it. Biden is the incumbent, and they're not going to put forth a progressive.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 56 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Yeah

The race is not people deciding between Biden and Trump, but people on both sides who have made up their minds deciding whether or not to vote

Coincidentally, there is an enormous effort to paint voting as not worthwhile, and Biden as not good enough to be worthwhile bothering to vote for, aimed at left wing voters

[–] knightly@pawb.social 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Actual left-winger here. We've been saying the USA deserves better than Biden since before the 2020 election. Don't lump us in with the centrists, liberals, and moderates who've only just pulled their heads out of the sand long enough to notice that the incumbent is expected to lose.

There's no point in starting to panic now, all this has been inevitable since the DNC won the right to rig their own primary after the disaster that was the "Her Turn" campaign in 2016. Either y'all start calling your reps and demanding a better option on the ballot, or start making preparations for the fascism and civil unrest in our future.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Highly infuriated with the Dems over Biden in 2020 BUT he has turned out remarkably better than I ever thought. He now has a decent track record that makes him a good choice for another 4 years. On the other hand, we could go all dictator/fascist and lose all democracy. It comes down to Joe Biden who is now the one hope to save democracy.
Take the bus that gets you closest to your destination folks. In the meantime, get progressives into offices at local and state levels so they can move up to congressional levels.

[–] 2484345508@lemy.lol 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes. Enormous efforts. “Genocide Joe” (the name) is part of that effort.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is one in this comments section

[–] 2484345508@lemy.lol 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just one? Are they a faux-commie?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot more now; it started out as one

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

I was more worried about it until I realized Lemmy is the only place I'd heard anyone say Genocide Joe.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is how effective psyops works.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Joe Biden is on track to win this election. Democrats are hell bent on snatching defeat from the mouth of victory.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Most people are just now waking up and paying attention while Biden's numbers are beginning to climb, in spite of his own party trying to sabotage him.

[–] gatorgato@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anyone sufficiently disengaged with Biden might just NOT vote. And then Trump wins. Heres a better framing of the question. Could anyone generate more voter disengagement than Biden?

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

This is my worry too. They're not going to switch to trump, they'll either skip it or vote 3rd party.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Vote blue no matter who died quickly I guess.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Those people are still voting blue. The issue is getting everyone else on board. "Vote blue no matter who" can't carry the election entirely on its own and never could. 2020 was won on razor margins.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

We need to get rid of the electoral college.

Biden beat Trump by 7 million votes. That it was "razor thin" is because of the electoral college.

Hillary lost to Trump despite winning the popular vote by 3 million because of the electoral college.

Gore lost because of Florida's electoral college (and all the fuckery there) despite winning the popular vote by 0.5million.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

Small correction: after numerous recounts, it was proven decidedly that Gore had won in FL. However, the corrupt Supreme Court decided that since the media (Fox News) had already called the election for Dubya, that it would pose too much risk to our democratic process to overturn the results to the correct outcome.

This is most amusing given the context of Jan 6 and the corrupt court’s opinions on that matter, but here we are.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I strongly agree with you but that's not going to change the fact that we still have to contend with the EC this election cycle.

Edit: also gore didn't lose by either metric he just didn't stick it out for the recount

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It would be enough to make an amendment so that the shape of electoral districts must be convex. This would make gerrymandering impossible.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

How do you actually fit together exclusively convex shapes?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

they’re not going to put forth a progressive.

The corporate media would shred a real progressive but Biden is a lot more progressive leaning than I ever thought he would be.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's part of why I'm so suspicious of this massive "Biden needs to be replaced" push. We're not getting better policy out of it, and I seriously doubt it'll hurt Trump's odds at re-election, so why is everyone so keen on it at this stage? The time to replace him was months ago.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

A travesty then, considering polling consistently shows progressives would wallop Trump, and the Dems claim that democracy is on the line this election. We could do so much better, but absolutely will not at the peril of capital.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We have narrow margins these days. Elections are decided by the undecided.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Who are these undecided voters? I haven't met one single undecided voter in the past 8 or more years. Maybe that's geography, but, jeez....

I feel that turnout is a far bigger factor.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com -1 points 5 months ago

It's pretty likely that a lot of those disengaged will not vote for Biden because they know he's too old