this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
206 points (95.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5376 readers
648 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
206
Farmers who graze sheep under solar panels say it improves productivity. So why don’t we do it more? (grist.org)
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The guy you're arguing with is the reason so many people simply tune out animal activists. He reminds me of the hippy character from Futurama on the poppers episode 😂

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You mean using reason and compassion? Yes, it's a horrible trait of animal rights activists.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What you're using isn't reason. It comes from a good place, I'm sure, but your arguments aren't reasonable.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just because you disagree does not make them unreasonable

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your solutions are unreasonable. Nobody is going to finance rehoming and caring for billions of livestock animals. We can't even do that for our own species.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I never suggested rethinking rehoming. I never once said that.