this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

Futurology

1740 readers
103 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, or you use actual 3D scene reconstruction from lidar or else and absolutely do know "there's a big massive thing in front of me, 101% a good action is not to drive into it".

Instead you softmax some random BS and fingers crossed.

[โ€“] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is the plastic bag reference. LIDAR cannot determine mass. A lot of cars were jamming on the brakes several years ago every time a plastic bag floated in front of their field of view. The algorithms were then tweaked in an attempt to prevent a 20 car pileup because the car freaked out about 1 oz of air-filled plastic. Humans make assessments like this on the fly based on our knowledge of physics, an understanding of real-time conditions, and some level estimation. We may even choose to ignore road markings and normal driving rules if we deem the risk too great vs. the risk of causing a secondary incident (pileup, attention of police, etc). This is not to say meat sacks are exactly perfect in these types of analyses either.. This is the tweaking the ML engineers are trying to perfect, for all possible scenarios. A difficult undertaking for humans and machines alike.