These figures include 'associative crime' as harm. So it apparent counts the cost of buying it as harm, it also counts the tax loss of that expenditure, so IMHO it skews unfavourabley to higher expenditure. But put that aside.

These figures show that all illicit drugs combined are less harmful to society than alcohol, and tautologically the harm is inflated by illegality.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They tried banning alcohol. It didn't work.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even worse, now we have NASCAR

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, but that gave us Comrade Dale Earnheart

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but to be fair a lot of things in the 1920’s US politics didn’t work.

Also the whole criminalization aspect to substance abuse is finally being talked about openly as a major failure in policy.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Banning things in general should be an absolute last-ditch effort, not the go-to response that it is today. We're supposed to be a free society, and I think a lot of citizens have lost sight of what that means.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

More than that I think society still doesn’t talk about addiction in a useful, healthy way very often. Alcohol being so ingrained in many cultures that it’s basically invisible to many people.