Technology

59366 readers

3668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

157

'Google Cast' is replacing the 'Chromecast built-in' brand (9to5google.com)

submitted 5 months ago by flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Well, at least they aren't outright throwing the functionality in the trash.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] five82@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I'm not defending Google but I think the change is just an admission that the old "Chromecast" branding is outdated. It wouldn't surprise me if less than 5% of users still regularly cast from a desktop browser.

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 4 points 5 months ago

🙋‍♂️

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I would do it more often, if firefox would fucking finally add it into the browser.

And no, that weird plugin doesn't count. It's buggy as hell

It's literally the only reason I have chrome installed

[–] prograhammingdev@lemmy.prograhamming.com 7 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure they can't bundle it. AFAIK the libraries required for it ship with Chrome / Android and it's not an open standard. The hacky weird workarounds are people brute forcing it.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago

How? It's closed sourced tech. Not like Firefox can just add it, they would have to pay Google for it (and that's assuming google would license Firefox for this and remove a competitive advantage from Chrome Browser)

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 3 points 5 months ago

if less than 5% of users still regularly cast from a desktop browser.

Wait, I could do that?! It doesn't matter a ton at the moment, but I might want to do that in future. I'll have to look into it.

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

All I know is I appreciate their slow roll. Everytime they break something I replace it with the non-Google option. I've got a small nuc as my main HTPC tied into my plex. Been waiting for an excuse to swap my first Gen Google hockey Puck from like 2012 in my bedroom.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago

I don't even use their browser and if anything I'd want a full video cable replacement and not just stream specific things.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Imo the old UI was way less clunky than the new one with the remote. You didn't need to log into anything, just cast to the screen. EZPZ. The new one, you need to install the app on the Chromecast, log in on the Chromecast, then you can cast n it will work maybe 60% of the time with casting. Casting's broken, but hey, it's cool, we have apps and a remote now, just use those. The stupid remote gets lost all the time, which obviously wasn't an issue before because your phone/ laptop was the remote. Google thought ahead though, and added remote functionality to the home app that also works about 60% of the time.

Tl;dr new Chromecast sucks.