this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
1190 points (96.3% liked)

tumblr

3416 readers
367 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The white supremacists usually have a large number of firearms and actively use the second amendment.

Seems like the perfect situation for a hyper-militarized police force to me.

(Not to say I think the government should deploy a proto-military force against protests, but like, if they're doing it anyway...)

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You’re right, but in most situations any casualties are unacceptable. The police will minimize their presence if they believe the people protesting have the conviction to use firearms against them. This is ehy the second amendment is so important, as defense for every other amendment against the corrupt and tyrannical.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

Do you have any bookmarks for evidence supporting this claim that you could share?

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm not American, but from my perspective, the modern interpretation of your second amendment seems to cause way more oppression than it relieves in practice.

Also, if there is a group of people with the "conviction" to kill other people with lethal force, that would be exactly where police should be getting involved.

Getting a bit off-topic, but since you brought it up I'd be remiss not to respond.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Your thinking is sonewhat correct. A group with firearms and the heart to use them would be a threat if the first response is to shoot. In most cases however the protest attempts to remain peaceful. Also, in many cases, only a small percentage have that conviction, but that small amount scares the police enough to keep them back.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The real irony is that the 2nd amendment is ineffective against a tyrannical government, and things that are effective (making bombs, molotovs, weaponized consumer drones) are pretty explicitly banned.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seems like the perfect situation for a hyper-militarized police force to me.

So you want more fascism?

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Not to say I think the government should deploy a proto-military force against protests, but like, if they're doing it anyway...