this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
518 points (98.9% liked)

News

23311 readers
3668 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 251 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Every cent made is a fine I want to see more of. Anything less is going to be seen as just the cost of doing business and the behavior will continue.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 86 points 6 months ago (4 children)

No, it should be 3x revenue, IMO it's not enough to just get that money back, it should cause some hurt on top of it.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yep! Every tech CEO I've worked with has a mentality of "It's just the cost of doing business." Since if they get fined, it's smaller than the profits they made. Or even better, many don't get fined and it's all profits!

As it stands - companies are punished for following the law.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Interesting too how that "cost of doing business" is basically money they don't receive as opposed to money they actually have to pay

[–] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Similarly, for rich people, a parking ticket isn't an imposition; it's simply what it costs to park there.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I partially agree, but 100% of revenue is still a loss. The R&D, employee pay, rent for facilities, and cost of input resources are still negative. 100% of profit would only encourage it still, but 100% of revenue is potentially a pretty strong punishment.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

If it’s imposed 100% of the times they do it

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I'd be happy with 1.1x, 1.2x revenue. They would loose our on development costs too. The only thing not recouped is any gain in brand recognition etc. Make them send a message to all of their customers, and take ads out informing the public how they broke the law, misled them etc.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Because we all know they are only catching the tip of the iceberg anyway

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

The article also states the settlement will go to refunding the defrauded customers. This needs to be the standard when prosecuting public harm of a business.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 20 points 6 months ago

It has to be more than every cent. That would still incentivize cheating since at worst it is a wash for them. Given they do not come close to getting 100% of offenders, the five needs to be multiples. It's like fare enforcement on subways and light rail. If you skip paying, you'll likely get away with it for a while. But overall, the five will cost you slightly more than if you would have just played by the rules.