this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
502 points (99.6% liked)

News

23267 readers
4480 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Here is a link to another post with an article.

https://lemmy.world/post/13553444

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Given how "easily" the bridge fell... Why aren't ships that size required to 100% be escorted by tugs???

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)

At the risk of sounding too Clarke and Dawe, it is very rare that a ship loses power and control, and somewhere it could hit something important, and hits that thing, and the thing is apparently so fragile that it just falls to pieces. It's been there for 46 years, and the Port of Baltimore currently sees an average of 53 ships in and out per month, so about 3.5 big ships under the bridge per day. That's a lot of passages over the years without incident.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

and the thing is apparently so fragile that it just falls to pieces.

I mean, it just got hit with a hundred thousand ton hammer. That'll do a pretty good number on most structures, I imagine.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For a structure that normally has these ships pass under it every day, it sure as hell should have had bollards to protect the piers against such an impact.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 6 points 7 months ago

bollards

made out of what and in what shape?

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

no, this is you speaking my language. we do 'risk assessments' and yeah I guess it's a case of severity*likelihood, where risk is never zero.

but, no matter what, when the risks 'line up' into a failure mode, holy shit is that failure catastrophic. crazy terrible regardless.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I don't know what the likelihood of this would be, but it's definitely miniscule. I suspect you'd still need safeguards to reduce the risk to an acceptable level, but I'm not sure what exactly you can do once a boat has failed and is going to make imminent impact.

At that point all you can do is mitigate the fatalities and evacuate.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

The bridge fell off

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cause then we would have to hire more people to tug all those ships in and it would be less efficient.

Not very profit margin of you to suggest that.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What's the profit margin of the port with the river blocked? And of the city with a major road cut?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago

The shareholders want their returns NOW!

[–] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Decades of stability pales in comparison to next quarters margins

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The company is about to find out that a quarter of high margins pales in comparison to the lawsuits awaiting them.

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Politics.

"More tug jobs? Not on my watch!"

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And money.

"Why do I need to pay for your safety"

[–] asret@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This'll be the real reason.

My comment was just unhelpful and inappropriate - a bad joke aimed at puritanical Americans.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I actually don't disagree with anything you said. I don't think you should feel bad (unless the comment is edited and I'm misunderstanding)

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Why aren't ships that size required to 100% be escorted by tugs???

They likely were, but there are limits on how fast even a group of tugs can influence a ship many times their size/weight/mass.

The laws of physics still apply.