this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
141 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32318 readers
928 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Spy satellites have always been valid targets. I don't think they're any more likely to shoot these ones down than any of the others.

[โ€“] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

For real. This seems like something that threatens musk and space x more than anybody else. The CIA effectively has unlimited money to replace whatever Russia takes down, but musk needing to pay to replace satellites to maintain starlink will hurt his bottom line. I don't think tin foil hat wearers would be all that unreasonable to make the assumption that this is a veiled threat to keep musk in line. I frequently hear the argument that "billionaires can't be bought" but I believe the exact opposite. They care more about money than morals and ethics, and can therefore be coerced by it either through hurting their bottom line or rewarding them with more of it. A dragon's hoard can never be too big for the dragon to accept more, and nothing hurts the drain more than reducing its hoard.