this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
462 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
2971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 224 points 8 months ago (4 children)

"Make do" with ethernet? Charlie Brown, ethernet is the superior networking interface. People "make do" with wifi.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 56 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm enjoying ethernet on my phone too

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I can tell that you're being sarcastic. But if I'm playing ranked match on my phone, it's always with an Ethernet dongle. Way more reliable and definitely lower latency.

[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

People actually play competitive games in their phone? I thought that was just marketing spin so apple didn’t have to put graphics cards in their macs

[–] ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's hilarious that you insist on the ethernet cable but not an actual computer.

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

I don't have a gaming computer (i7 3770K with integrated graphics from 2012)

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You don’t get cellular data? Okay, sure it’s faster for that too.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago

Problem solved i guess, that's progression.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

lol your comment made people salty for some reason

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

It's absolutely making do. Having to plug an Ethernet cable in every time you take your laptop to someone else's office, break room or conference room simply doesn't work. Offices aren't designed for it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 67 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's when you make do with WiFi.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Conference rooms, yes. Break rokms, yes. Offices? No. Use a docking station? Are you working solely from your laptop screen or do you dock and use monitors mouse and keyboard? Generally, there's ethernet attached, too.

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Wireless sucks. Wired is always better.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

Just gonna ignore those real-world examples and insist on fantasy land, eh?

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Wireless is always better than no connection at all if you need a connection and you’re not wired.

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can't realistically plug your phone into the wall every time you want to use the internet

The whole point of a mobile phone is that it's mobile

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ok Zoomer.

We're talking about offices where people generally use laptops for work. Why are you mentioning mobiles?

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What if I want to move my laptop around the office, say for example to make a presentation, or work in a different area? If I'm just working on some documents online, I don't need a fast connection, just 30-50Mbit is plenty enough for pretty much everything, including video calls etc

And what you're telling me you never use a mobile at work? You still need a signal to make/receive regular phone calls

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's true, which is why the article mentions one of the things googlers are doing is using their phone as a hotspot.

Y'see the phone gets it's internet from the cell tower. It then passes the internet to the laptop via a local (i.e. 2 feet) wifi or bluetooth connection.

That's an entirely different thing than enterprise-wide wifi. And if the building was blocking cell phone signals - well, first of all I'd be impressed, and secondly they would tear it down.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Moan and groan all you like, it doesn't change the fact that wireless is almost always an option and wired is almost never an option.

Even desktop PCs come with wifi adapters. Finding a laptop with an Ethernet port is damn near impossible.

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't most of (maybe all) dell and lenovo laptops come with ethernet ports by default ?
And nowadays, with thunderbolt docking stations, you have more or less every connection available anyway.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Don’t most of (maybe all) dell and lenovo laptops come with ethernet ports by default ?

Nope. Ethernet ports are gone.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If ethernet is not an option, you're just wasting time. Ethernet-to-USB dongles are cheap and plentiful.

It's crazy that people with no experience with it have no idea why anyone would want to fuss with a direct wired connection when it's objectively faster and more stable in every metric possible.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Assumptions, assumptions... My company is a communications company and actually produces networking equipment. Almost no one uses Ethernet because we have the knowledge and experience to implement reliable wifi. Perhaps your company should hire us since they've done such a bad job with their own implementation.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Conference rooms should have ethernet connected to the USB-C dongle that's attached to the TV and the Jabra or whatever alternative you use.

Wouldn't want to take my laptop to the break room, I go there to take a break from work, not continue it in a different setting.

I'll agree on going to someone else's office, or using your laptop in a meeting where someone else is connected up, but that's where Wi-Fi works as the back-up.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lol! One Ethernet cable in a conference room? What if someone else is using it? Next you'll proudly state that you carry an Ethernet switch everywhere you go. But, you be you.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I just said wifi works as the backup solution if you're not the one presenting. If you ARE the one presenting, wouldn't you want to have a more stable connection?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but tell that again when you and 19 other people bring your laptop to a conference room and try to login on the network at the same time.

Different things have different strengths, and losing one of those things means your experience will be subpar.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So, I haven't worked in IT in a couple decades, but back in the late '90s/ early '00s, all the conference tables at the companies I worked for, had Ethernet ports built into the table towards the center, and a switch mounted under the table so that everyone could just plug in. Did they stop making those tables once WiFi became ubiquitous?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, they stopped. The ports were never sufficient, people always wanted to move the table around, and the cables and connectors in the table were always breaking.

Besides, there are always people far from the table.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It's true, they used to be more available and then they stopped making those tables for those reasons (and they were more expensive).

Yes, in a conference room setting with more than 3 people it's better to have wifi, no disagreement there. In google's case here it sounds like they'd bring a mobile hotspot in so everyone could see the documents together, which is not ideal but would work.

Still, they'd have ethernet for the video sharing so they could just put a router in each conference room (a huge pain to admin, but - it's google) and everyone gets wifi in the conference room and no one is very slightly inconvenienced.

OR - y'know. Bring back the ethernet. Werd.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What do they think their precious wifi routers plug into?

An actual cloud?

When it rains are they terrified of losing their data?

[–] twilightwolf90@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And a lot of people do. Cellular and satellite internet is excellent for rural and certain business use cases. I have gigabit fiber, and I'm considering one of those in case the Internet goes out if fiber is hit or if we lose utility power (I have a battery backup system).

Yes. Those folks are scared when it rains too hard. The connection does become more unstable.

I still acknowledge that your point is valid for everyone else however.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I was just making a cartoonish joke about clouds leaking.

Wasnt thinking rain fade lol.