this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
218 points (97.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
3752 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Three U.S. C-130 cargo planes dropped 66 total bundles, equating to about 38,000 pork-free meals, into the territory on Saturday morning. The bundles were split between three planes, the official said."

"The airdrop is expected to be the first of many announced by President Joe Biden on Friday. The aid will be coordinated with Jordan, which has also conducted airdrops to deliver food to Gaza."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Israel says many of the dead were trampled in a chaotic crush for food aid, and its troops fired warning shots after the crowd moved toward them in a threatening way.

So we are totally uncritically accepting their narrative now, got it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So we are totally uncritically accepting their narrative now, got it.

I dont know if you are following the current NYT drama or not but this article and its underpinnings have been forming up since the 7th.

Basically several NYT and BBC (bbc not covered in the above) stories and articles have been show to be basically plants.

Then there is the shockingly uncritical way that the US government took the Israeli report on UNRRA, that upon any inspection, has 0 evidence attached to it.

Its a total shit show. If it wasn't actual fascism on the line at the ballot box this November, I wouldn't be voting for Joe Biden, and even then, he makes it harder to stomach every week.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I live in a red state. Republicans have made me actually worry about my children's future in more ways than one. I will be lining up to vote for Democrats for the foreseeable future unless there's a truly radical candidate running D (maybe RFK Jr if he ever runs).

I hate that my choice is to vote against my children or not. I wish both parties were rational. Instead the real election is the primaries. And this year there basically wasn't one.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There are a lot more positions to vote on than the POTUS.

The more support the president has in the other branches, the more they all can do, and the ~~future~~ fewer consessions.

The fact of the matter is, the Dems need majorities in both houses, and enough margin that a couple DINOs can't fuck everything up.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

100% We need a majority of liberals. Or a couple of untimely deaths in the Supreme Court when Dems have the Senate.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

You have to protect yourself before you can help others.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please no RFK Jr. He may be a "radical" option in that he's literally insane, but he's a horrible option.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

That's what I meant when I said there's few Dems I might not vote for. He's one of them.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't like how the news gives so much credence to what they say. But at least they'll usually qualify it with "Israel says" or "IDF says" so we know it's bullshit.

Edit: Oh and anything ADL. Although that one is less obviously BS for those that don't know who they are.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How is quoting someone/thing "uncritically accepting their narrative"? They're telling you what Israel said. It's up to you to believe it or not, but it's journalistic malpractice to just not report the alleged justification from one of the parties involved. What are you asking for, exactly?

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because it doesn't include the other widely reported quotes about 80% of victims being injured by gunfire not crush injuries.

Selection and omission of quotes is absolutely a form of bias.

If it isn't evidenced it's not a fact. If it's not a fact you're editorialising.

There are sometimes reasons not to evidence a statement. But a disputed statement is not something which should get included in a news article.

[–] alilbee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, I'm with you that omitting context on this developing situation is inappropriate, but that's not what we were discussing. You're right, the statement is disputed, but it is a fact that it is the statement they have made. Journalists have a responsibility to report the facts to you, and that's what we currently have from one of the major parties involved. And your last take regarding disputed statements not being covered just makes no sense. Literally all political coverage would be unethical under that framework. I have a right to know the batshit insane things powerful people are saying and it's up to me to draw my own conclusions from the facts and perspectives provided.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

I’m not. But that’s just gonna divorce me even more fully from the current American zeitgeist and ensure I’ll be even more completely isolated.