this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
1349 points (94.4% liked)
Fediverse
28277 readers
961 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I see your panic and raise you a "what's the solution?"
Keep it separate, mass de-federate. The biggest lemmy instance has to make a stance.
Wonder if they were invited to metas p92 meeting for "off the record conversation" and obliged
I have opposite take on this. For me, it would be nice to interact with normie friends while we use our favorite service
So they have already reaching OP's first point without doing anything
Defederate the big corps immediately.
Activity Pub needed to integrate privacy protection into its licence.
At this point there is nothing we can do.
No. That would've been a much worse disaster. It is a good thing that APIs and protocols aren't licensable/copyrightable.
Have fun with a data scraping, corporate run fediverse then.
Instead of one with actual police, lesser of two evils
I'm not sure you understand me. What I wanted to say is that if APIs and protocols would be copyrightable, and SCO and Oracle would've won their respective lawsuits, the world would look so different (in regards to Free and Open Source Software) I'm not completely sure if Fediverse would be a thing.
I think the solution is for each instance to decide whether to federate with Threads or not.
The only way an attempt to coopt the Fediverse wouldn't happen world be if the project failed. If this system is going to work, major players will want to participate, and they'll want to accrue power and dominate over the system. Creating tools to establish boundaries and checks is fundamentally the point, so I think we should all strive to understand and contribute to the development and administration of institutions we like. And if we do that, and also compel our governments to impose regulations on big tech they WILL come up against limits to their power.
I'll raise your "what's the solution" with a "lets avoid the problem entirely".
Prevention is better than cure.