Can you explain this reference? Everyone keeps mentioning a Harold, and I see that it's getting upvoted a lot, so I think I'm the only one who doesn't know what this means.
I think it's fucked up when people create ideological conditions for personhood. The whole point of fundamental human rights is that we afford them to everyone. It's not like it's an accident that we give them to the very worst people. That's kind of the core concept.
If you're opposed to the concept of universal human rights, I don't love it, but I can accept that. I think that's probably a majority opinion, honestly. But I just feel like whenever someone says that a group of people "aren't people", I think we should make sure we're not tip-toeing around that. It should be out on the table.
The fact that there aren't patients seems immaterial. The rules against this aren't predicated on how many patients are inside.
By militarizing the hospital, they've made it a target, which you're not supposed to do. That's essential infrastructure. That's jeopardizing that critical infrastructure by using it as a shield.
It's not good.
You know, part of it is that I grew up drinking in the same propaganda. I GET the arguments.
In one sense, a lot has already ended. I think a lot of people in Israel -- I'm thinking primarily of those we used to think of as non-radical -- are in grief. Not just over Oct. 7, but because they know subconsciously that the good times are over. They were living in a fantasy, and now comes a rude awakening.
Either they accept a far right fascist police state or they give up the dream of unchallenged dominion over what they believe is their birthright. Either way, their dream of a progressive, modern, fully-Jewish state over the whole region was never possible because it required ignoring the reality of millions of unwanted people, and now they're crashing into the hard realization that the dream is dead. I think it's possible for that to be replaced with a new dream that includes equal rights for non-Jews, but that's still going to be a painful process that millions of people will have to be dragged into.
And now I have to witness both the pain of people I related to in some way, and also the reminder of what we're all capable of. These people are tying their brains in knots to perpetuate generational horrors against a subjugated group, like a kid who escaped a childhood of abuse only to grow up and perpetuate the same thing on their kids. And not only that, I'm not naive enough to think I wouldn't be capable of it too. I come from a different circumstance, but if I'd been born there? I'd probably be on board. No one wants to believe this, but most likely, so would you. So would most of us.
Add to all this that I'm also clear-eyed that there are plenty of people who do not have the mental complexity to protect one group of people without dehumanizing their oppressors. I don't really blame them, but I can see that in their heart, they don't really mind mass slaughter, they just have different preferences for who should be on the receiving end. Would they care if it was me? Or my kid? I pray I never need to find out. My plan is to just keep trying to make a world where everyone is safe and hope it works out.
It's terrible to watch on so, so, SO many levels.
I agree. I like the kind of dichotomy of how his persona is sort of like a cyberpunk edge-lord, but he's clearly got a very prosocial, constructive, ethical worldview.
That's why I felt like he was a good fit for the game. I have no idea how popular the channel is, or whether people will even recognize that the character is a reference. We'll see.
I take it you're a fan.
We don't have a union.
I'd like to form or join one, but we don't have one at the moment.
It's true, but it doesn't mean I can't feel badly for these people too.
My empathy is not a finite resource.
That sounds like a good start.
I don't think Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Ben-Gvir will like that, because they really hate it when the UN tries to do UN stuff at them, but that sounds like a very appropriate request.
It's going to be awkward to listen to John Kirby explain into a microphone why having peacekeepers from the unarmed peace force standing in the vicinity of a lot of women and children in the area that Biden has insisted the IDF not kill everyone is helping Hamas.
I definitely hear it from time-to-time. I often probably hear it without knowing it's her. I heard that song "It's me... HI. I'm the problemitsme. It's me: Hi. everybody agrees..."
As you can tell, it kinda got in my head from repetition a few times, and I didn't know it was hers until long after I'd heard it.
But I don't listen to much music overall. I sometimes pick up CDs from the library to burn to my computer, but I don't listen to Spotify or the radio, so I miss a lot of stuff.
Can you think of the coolest thing that you found out about later that you'd dismissed while it was popular?
I can't think of something I actively talked down, but I remember watching Star Trek (TNG) for the first time in my mid thirties (about four years ago) and thinking, "Boy, if I'd known about this while it was on, I'd probably have been obsessed with it."