this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
189 points (97.0% liked)
unions
1653 readers
15 users here now
a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc
Friends:
- https://lemmy.ml/c/labor
- https://sh.itjust.works/c/unions
- https://lemmy.ml/c/coops
- https://lemmy.ml/c/antitrust
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While everyone should be able to afford basic necessities like a vehicle and wages need to be increased across the board, the title is weird. You can work at a factory making a thing you can't afford and not have much of a problem with that. "I build cruise liners for a living. I can't afford to buy one." would be a strange statement.
Mate, come on. He makes Toyotas, not super yachts. I think you're missing the point.
I don't think his view here is "anything that I have a hand in manufacturing, I should be able to afford".
That's not the point of this video, and it's not the mindset that anybody is espousing.
As I said in another reply, fair enough. I just read it in a way that inferred something it seems other people didn't.
Is this video about something only large corporations can afford, or is it about something that is necessary for lots of families to have and seen as normal to buy?
Please reread my first sentence.
How does that make your bad argument better?
You say people should be able to afford necessities. Then you compare buying a car to buying a cruise ship. One is a necessity to many people, one is completely unrelated to people.
Yes the argument makes no sense when you change the subject completely.
A car is a necessity, nobody is denying that and I state as much. To be clear, I think people should be able to afford cars. I just don't think it's weird to work at a factory where you make luxury items more expensive than the average person can afford.
Ok, so we can say in plain terms: a person working in a factory should be able to afford **buying a car**.
Yep, and I think that would have been a better title.
But that is the title.
It's alright, I'm willing to just take the L on this one. I just thought the title was inferring something that it seems some people don't.
I...uh...don't know how to respond to this. It's never happened before.
But for real, though. Thank you for engaging in good faith and being amiable.
A car shouldn't be a necessity. public transport, short transfers, walkable cities and all that. But I agree – it is a necessity, sadly.