this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
85 points (91.3% liked)
Linux
48083 readers
911 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everything works fine for me on AMD system with Pop. These types of posts are usually from folks with systems that have poor compatibility. That's not Wayland's fault.
Meanwhile, after updating my nvidia driver to 545.x, I can no longer play games on Wayland due to heavy flickering. Ah well, at least I can still switch to X11 for gaming. But Nvidia really drag their asses when it comes to Wayland (or linux gaming in general) support.
I got lucky and found an Rx 5500 for $70 in a pawn shop. I had a 1650 for a while and I didn't realize how bad Nvidia drivers actually are. All the bugs and flickering is gone. I thought it was Wayland not being ready but Nvidia is actually just trash
Gaming still works fine for me on 545. It's just that every other XWayland program flickers endlessly. Thunderbird, Freetube, Bitwarden...
God I hope NVK is the driver I'm using happily by the end of this year.
You're right, it's seem to be xwayland issue. All games games that run on proton is unplayable due to flickers, but native linux vulkan games works smoothly. I somehow thought proton already supports wayland but turns out it's still using xwayland. I'm pretty sure it's not this bad on 535.
Hm, odd. I'm playing Rocket League with Proton fine with no flickering. I'm using KDE. Proton 8 shouldn't have any of the Wine Wayland stuff yet...
And yeah, I had a massive flickering problem for my entire monitor on 535, but the problem is now localized to XWayland programs on 545, so it's an improvement for me.
In my case, if the game framerate > monitor framerate, no issue with proton under xwayland. But if the game framerate < monitor framerate, it'll flicker or stutter heavily.
New vegas is smooth, while rdr2 would flicker and stutter.
I've been getting stutters for a long time. I've kind of come to accept it as part of the Proton / NVIDIA experience :) Though the stuttering has finally receded to almost nothing since running KDE Wayland. It's actually a lot worse on X11 for me.
I haven't checked, but Freetube and Bitwarden sound like they're just electron apps, running them with
--ozone-platform-hint=autoenables Wayland detection. You can add it to the app's.desktopfile if it works.I'd completely forgotten about that. I do that for Signal already. Thanks for the tip! Bitwarden finally doesn't lag (that was annoying the hell out of me) but Freetube is still a stuttery mess. FreeTube is an Electron-based program, so no idea...
(I just remembered I could startup Thunderbird with
MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1too)It's mainly just Steam that's horrible...really, the worst one of the lot by far. Massive flickering in the client. Games themselves work fine though.
I experienced some bugs while gaming on Wayland even with an amd card. My workaround was switching back to X11 for gaming. That said, I didn't even notice that I was using Wayland by default for a long time until Firefox completely switched to Wayland I experienced some heavy artifacts in Firefox (only if it's full screen on my second monitor, but that's a daily thing). And because of that, switching back to X11 isn't a workaround anymore, unfortunately its my new default.
We built a new standard giving zero backwards compatibility, no path to migrate and removed existing functionality. You can't blame us when things don't work!
I see your point, but at the same time, Wayland isn't brand new. Devs have had well over a decade to get their stuff Wayland-ready.
At some point, the likes of Nvidia really do need to be told to hurry up and get their stuff ready. We can't stick to X11 forever.
Why should devs pay any attention to wayland when after a decade the project still suffers from severe deficiencies of functionality over X11.
@TheGrandNagus @atzanteol
Wayland is not supposed to be a drop-in replacement for X11. It will always have feature differences. There are things that X11 does that should not be handled by the display protocol.
And they should pay attention to it because X11 is dead. It's in life support mode. It's basically impossible to maintain. The devs have abandoned it for Wayland.
It can't cope with modern desktop usage like multiple displays with different refresh rates (not without weird hacks and workarounds anyway), different displays with different scaling, touch support is awful, HDR support won't be a thing, performance is worse, and security is terrible.
Wayland is the future of the Linux desktop. Pretty much all DEs and distros are on board.
Sure devs of random programs can say "I refuse to support Wayland!", that is their right. But in doing so they are effectively deciding to abandon Linux development, because X11 is going the way of the dinosaurs, and if you think otherwise then I don't know what to tell you. You're living in a fantasy world.
It's a massive change! Wayland hasn't been ready either. They're still debating support for features.
It's been ready for general use for years, most distros have had it enabled for a long time.
But yeah it's not ready for every use case. Then again, neither is X11, I suppose.
It's not ready for existing use cases that X11 has. And won't have some of the features.
The Wayland team, from what I can tell, seems to be comprised of "architectural purists". They're so concerned with the right way to do things they're ignoring pragmatic impact to downstream apps. And so they debate over trivial things like whether to allow "windows to position themselves" and "whose job is that?" which is silly and has been solved by practically every other OS.
So yes - application teams haven't caught up. But because Wayland is a huge lift from X11. You can't just change everything and then bitch about how the rest of the world simply hasn't "seen the light" yet. It's a lot of work for an application team that provides zero new functionality for users. And it's ridiculous that the Wayland team is trying to push blame on to others at this point.
Again, they've had well over a decade to move to Wayland. It hasn't been suddenly sprung upon them.
If they don't want to move, they don't have to. But that does basically entail giving up on Linux.
And it doesn't provide zero new functionality... I do things on my PCs that I can't do with X11. Multiple monitors with different scaling and refresh rates, tear-free, 1-to-1 gestures, actual security, better performance, fewer bugs, soon there will be HDR. All stuff that's either not possible with X11 or require hacky workarounds.
You talk of the "Wayland team", but you need to understand... the "Wayland team" is the X11 team. They are the same people. They left X11 and have moved to Wayland.
Tbh, all of this bickering is futile. We know Wayland is the present (of most distros anyway), and the future. App developers can either accept that or they can abandon Linux. There's not really a viable medium-long term alternative, even the slower-moving projects are moving to it. X11 is on life support.
This is like when everyone was complaining about the move away from DOS. At some point, people have to accept that the platform has been updated.
Are you under the impression that I'm arguing against moving to Wayland? I'm not. I'm saying the team has done a shit job of managing the migration. And yes - that's the X11 team.
@TheGrandNagus @atzanteol I agree with you about purists and poor attitude towards reality but at the same time I’ve been using Wayland for a few years now without personally having issues
When I try it I get a blank screen and nothing happens. So. 🤷
@atzanteol guy at sh.itjust.works can't get shit to work :)
jk
at the same time, besides maybe rendering my screen 0.0000001ms faster than X, i can't tell you anything it does in any way better or different than X
puts pictures + words on screen, yay
Hah!
I run Wayland and it's definitely worse than X11, but it's getting better day by day. I always struggle with Wayland and I literally did nothing different than installing KDE Wayland. For example, ever since I moved to Wayland, Firefox will randomly freeze and crash when I'm using my PC - this happens at least once per gaming session.
Also, Wayland is still not feature complete and assuming it's the system fault for poor compatibility is wrong.
Just give arewewaylandyet.com a read.
I've been using sway for ~2 months extensively and didn't experience a single firefox freeze or crash. Before that I played around with weston and firefox crashed every 15 minutes.
I disagree.