this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
93 points (89.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26890 readers
1912 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I ll start : I have been following a pretty known tech/Linux journalist, and always found he is a fun dude to listen to, with interesting tech takes

The fact that he is also very openly "american conservative" (aka, religious & weapon nut, anti abortion, etc) annoys me, but i keep those things separate. And he does keep it separate too (politics channel vs tech channel), which is a great decision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 36 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I wish the Democrats in the US were less willfully ignorant about firearms so they'd pass less stupid and ineffectual legislation out of fear and/or pandering.

Every time California passes an "assault weapons ban" that targets a specific ergonomic feature (pistol grips, removable magazines, what the hell ever they're focusing on now) and gun manufacturers find a work around before the bill even comes into effect, I just roll my eyes.

At this point I'm forced to assume it's purely performative.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Case in point. Great video of all the work the manufacturer made to keep the gun compliant. Its quite funny when you look at it.

https://youtu.be/CcNS4JdprWc?si=1_MiJQ-DjyxUmLze

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ForgottenWeapons and InRangeTV are the only channels I still subscribe to, because they're not constantly bitching about gun laws and parroting conservative talking points.

The one time I've actually seen Ian make a statement about pending legislation, and he's coming at it from a very respectable angle, saying basically "this law is poorly worded and over-inclusive and I think it's going to cause some serious issues": https://youtube.com/shorts/aMHGtM051jc?si=nvB2q2vktbwBuULq

I mean, it's exactly what I was talking about. Politicians pushing terrible firearms legislation out of willful ignorance.

All it does is annoy and inconvenience lawful gun owners, and push the center-right further towards the MAGA crowd.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t matter. If liberals and centrists did nothing, they’d just fabricate that they were coming for guns. It’s a cult. Facts and Reason don’t come into it.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I too wish they could pass real gun control legislation that would result in less weapons on the streets and in people's homes.

Unfortunately, all we can ever get passed are bs laws that gun nuts won't bother to fight against, considering the massive amounts of political spending on "single-issue" voters that care more about being able to shoot their neighbors than they care about living under a democratic-elected government.

I mean, who needs functioning institutions when you have a fuckin gun?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Can't they just ban auto/semi-auto? Or if those aren't strict categories, define them, eg. "cannot shoot more than x bullets / second"? That one would likely be too broad but you get the idea.

[–] Bort@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Banning semi auto would ban like 90 percent of guns :/

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I feel an urge to say "oh well" but that's my own bias shining through lol

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Auto is banned. Everything is semi auto except bolt action rifles. All handguns are semi auto.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Banning would piss off a lot of people. It'd be better to just place more restrictions on semi autos. Outright bans are very politically expensive.