this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1470 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
2224 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 182 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Living through an event isnt the same thing as being knowledgeable about it. eg. There are plenty of 911 truthers that were around when 911 happened.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 114 points 1 year ago (6 children)

And they think everyone just ate the WMDs in Iraq thing. No, I was there at the protests. Many of us knew it was a bullshit excuse.

The only thing Iraq and Al Qaeda had in common was the Q. We knew that then.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Many of us knew it was a bullshit excuse.

This fucken clown.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yep, I very distinctly remember watching this speech on the TV in the breakroom at work, thinking, "Hold up, what the fuck do WMDs in Iraq have anything at all to do with the people who crashed those planes?" But the general vibe of people actually cheering as they listened to the beat of the war drums was terrifying. There were a lot of us who never bought that bs

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So many young people have no clue how fucking terrifying it was, and Bush's image has been somewhat rehabilitated as well. People are afraid of Trump bringing about a fascist revolution, but he's a clown compared to the Bush crowd. A lot of the shit we're dealing with today got started or really accelerated under Bush. Reagan is in a similar position.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rumsfeld.. that guy just seemed to straight up want to kill people...

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Very respectable and dedicated man, professional public servant who's hollow in the inside and only wishes for the blood of the innocent. Classic "banality of evil".

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

Yep, never forget it was the elder Bush's regime that brought us the Sonic Youth song "Youth Against Fascism" 30 fucking years ago

They've been at this shit a loooooong time

https://youtu.be/eWzIlCJAw-o?si=Gsj21oHJEdYC_H_k

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bush’s image has been somewhat rehabilitated

They're doing for Bush what they did for Reagan

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Well they're not trying to name everything they can get their hands on after Bush, yet...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So many people back then thought Saddam had something to do with 9/11. Poll after poll showed it. It was so damn depressing.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They were pushing that narrative pretty fucking hard. At the same time some clown was sending anthrax letters around and they used that too. There were also protests at the white house before the invasion about no war for oil, so it's not like support was universal and plenty of people saw through the ruse.

But then there was that whole freedom fries thing... dear God.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There were protests nationwide, at many college campuses and federal courthouses.

We had over 4,000 people protest at some podunk town. We even had a bunch of news cameras cover it.

He was easily the most identifiable "bad guy" in the middle east aside from Yasser Arafat in the public's imagination. Probably contributed to it a bit...

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yep, I was fired up, on board.

"So, Iraq..."

Wait, what?

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

I remember watching CNN and seeing "evidence" of WMDs found. It was some piece of shit flatbed truck with a load of pipes covered by a tarp: dirty, crudely cut, metal pipes. Apparently they were possibly raw materials for ... missiles.

Yeah.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

He maintained that he really brought anthrax to the UN that day. Which either means he was one of the most reckless people on the planet or that you can't trust a word he said. We'll probably never know now.

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it was obvious that they'd already decided to invade Iraq long before Powell's infamous UN presentation.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US has contingency plans filed to invade every country on the planet.

Would like to see the Vatican ones lol

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

His career really got started with covering up the May Lai massacre and got worse from there.

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 19 points 1 year ago

So you're telling me the "a" is a conspiracy? Interesting... nods profusely

[–] Liz@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's the craziest thing. Significant numbers of people were calling them out on their lies while they were saying them and they still managed to get massive amounts of support to invade Iraq.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's because Saddam did have as chemical weapons program, it just wasn't advanced as the US/UK governments wanted to believe it was...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've heard Sam Harris talk about how we only knew the end story was bs afterwards, and that there was no credible opposition....

[–] kaput@jlai.lu 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Canada Not following USA into that war should should have been a good clue

[–] r0m2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

France as well! Republicans gave us French so much shit for standing up to the US and refuse to support the invasion. "Freedom fries", "Surrender monkeys" and all that crap.

[–] kaput@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom fries... hehehe je trouve encore ça drôle. À bien ý penser c'était un des premiers signes de la transformation débile de la politîque américaine.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Well, there was trickle down economics before that. Reagan was the downfall.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Refusing to get pressured into wartime adventurism was absolutely the right move, and the French said so at the time despite the juvenile insults being tossed their way by our dimmest politicians.

I remember when Republicans tried to hit Obama for going on an "apology tour" after W and his clowns trashed our most cherished alliances.

The worst part is that they're too cynical or stupid to be embarrassed for themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Sam used to be cool. I'm so disappointed in him.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sam was never cool. You were duped.

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] Jaytreeman@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I've heard him say so many bad takes. I used to really like the guy too

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean someone who tries to sell a theory on objective scientific morality has many bad takes?

[–] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I was a fan before that point.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's because I grew up in a conservative area, but most of the people in my area bought the WMD thing hook, line, and sinker. Granted, I don't even think a lot of people needed even that much of an excuse to support going to war. There was a lot of anger after 9/11 and a lot of people who couldn't tell the difference between Iraq and Iran wanted to bomb the middle east and the Dubya administration was more than happy to tap into that anger.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Aside from Abu Mus'ab al-Zarqawi meeting with Osama Bin Laden and being labeled as an extremist by him which led him to going back to Iraq to partake in leaving the Iraqi militancy movement.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Living through an event isnt the same thing as being knowledgeable about it.

But it can definitely help to understand the background before the event which is something that wouldn't typically be captured by regular news reports.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

There are dangers with just "experiencing" a thing. Most of us that experienced it were just watching whatever news cast or government speech we chose that was currently being broadcast. Even if you were directly affected by 9/11 by being near it, you really didn't have any more tangible information about what caused it than all the stuff that's come out since then.

I saw the rubble in person, I smelled the fuel/whatever that stench was. (seriously I've smelled decay, that wasn't decay) But for seeing it I got no better information than someone sitting at home watching a TV.

In fact it might have been worse because at the time we were all blindly angry. We weren't wrong to be angry, but people don't think clearly in those conditions. Meanwhile politicians are brainstorming spin and advantage. Military contractors are spinning up presentations to prepare for the upcoming bids.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people don't understand the events they live through let alone the background of them, so, no.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Most" is not all.

Plus each person has their own perspective on an event, even if it is just their singular isolated life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

To be fair. Truthers for 9/11 don't disbelief in the event ala Holocaust Deniers or "Covid Truthers"

They believe that the event was arranged by the US government in order to go to War... which many believed at the time and still do "No blood for oil."

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

January 6th too