this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
1928 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59168 readers
3126 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Automated background removal was also added recently.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 232 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Better hold on to your pants, Photoshop. Here's the new contender!

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

GIMP 3.0 stomps door with sexy moustache

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As it should, I've tried twice to use GIMP, always gone back to Photoshop.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For how relatively well known it is (it's probably like the next most well known piece of FOSS after Linux and Blender) I can't believe how bad a piece of software GIMP is.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hope you mean the UX. I think attacking it's functionality would be unfair. It does everything good and right .... technically.

If the UX is objectively bad or "just" subjectively might be hard to find out. I would assume if there are objective UX mistakes, some contributor might have been able to deal with that by now. But of course it doesn't change anything if a majority doesn't like it for subjectice reasons. It's part of UX design to deal with subjective aspects.

[–] roembol@lemmy.roembol.nl 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not having adjustment layers is a pretty big deal

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or you know, being able to rearrange layers.

That one time I had to use GIMP, I found that simply dragging worked fine.

[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or color spasecs other than sRGB (8 bits/channel). I've a camera that takes 10 bits/channel photos, a monitor that displays 10 bits/channel, etc. But GIMP will just distort the colors because they hard-coded the color space! Can't edit for print either, no CMYK. GIMP is an image editor for the noughties, not the 2020s.

Then again, we're talking about MS Paint here. If Paint fills your needs, GIMP will be fine.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 1 year ago

Not just 10bit. The Linux version still makes 8bit images more purple after saving.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Paint fills your needs, GIMP will be fine.

Disagree. Paint's function is to be the Notepad of images, something not very powerful but quick and dead simple.

GIMP is needlessly hard to use.

Yes, Krita is by far a better editor.

Good news for you, if they ever get around to releasing gimp 3

[–] conno02@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

as a doofus gimp user, what's an adjustment layer?

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Not a professional either, but I was also curious and learned:

It's a layer of which the properties/filters apply to all layers below. So you can basically try around and manipulate the visible image without having to combine the layers first.

[–] roembol@lemmy.roembol.nl 1 points 1 year ago

It's a way to for apply effects in a non-destructive way

[–] Crul@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've been waiting for years for "non-destructive edition" (AKA smart objects). It's a fundamental feature that I use (almost?) always as a first step. IMHO a lof of professional work is not practical without it.

They had it on the roadmap (see 2020 archive) for years marked as "No[t started]". The current roadmap looks more promising with "link layers" marked as WIP and saying it could be available on GIMP 3.0.2.

[–] conno02@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

ive been stuck with gimp and now ive been stockholm syndromed into liking it

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago

I use Gimp a lot.

It does its job very well, but that job is not to be an alternative to photoshop.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I used GIMP before Photoshop and I still massively prefer GIMP.

I really think its a case of what you got used to first.

Then all the defenders go "But it's free and open-source!" and you can tell they are just paying lipservice.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Paint is not designed to be GIMP/Photoshop alternative. It is just a simple drawing program. Although it is great that they have finally added these long-awaited features, as I may finally move from paint.net, which is also great but it has one huge drawback - it is not a single window, which is a hassle.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

been using photopea for years, highly recommended for quick projects!