this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
318 points (90.2% liked)

pics

19311 readers
46 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Always amses me to see you guys build your wood houses. This looks so much like a construction game for children, I want to play too!

[–] ophy@lemmy.nz 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I live on a fault line along the pacific ring of fire, and so building with wood was an absolute necessity for us so long, as they were structurally more lenient to the constant earthquakes. Even now I believe our old government building is the largest wooden building in the Southern hemisphere (and it's only 4 stories tall). These days as construction techniques have changed, we've obviously built things with concrete, steel, brick, etc., but the wooden tradition remains strong, with a huge majority of modern houses here still being built like this.

That aside, wood was also just a much cheaper material to build with, so it was the most economical material to use for a long time for much of the "new world".

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. Buildings were mostly wood and mud in Europe until the 18th Century. By then, cities became so dense that big fires were extremely deadly. Little by little people started building in stone, then bricks and now reinforced concrete.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It didn't really have anything to do with fires. Pretty much every hardwood forest was cut down in Europe and any remaining were protected so they could be used to build ships.

America was colonized late enough that it never really became an issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (8 children)

you guys build your wood houses

What do you normally build houses with?

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Here in Europe, we use mostly cinder blocks or bricks. I guess wood is more common in Northern Europe and Switzerland

[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (16 children)

In California we use wood because it flexes during earthquakes. There may be damage during a big one but at least the house is less likely to collapse on you.

[–] MrsDoyle@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

In earthquakes in NZ the wooden houses flex for sure. What kills you is the brick chimney falling through the roof.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If we did that in the US west coast, they would crack and fall apart from tectonic plate shift. You need to build things to be flexible for earthquakes and general shift.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I live in a 100 year old farm house in California and every spring and fall we have to move the strike plate (thing the door latch nubbin goes into) on the front door up or down about 3/4 inch due to seasonal house shifting. The door stops closing and we know it's spring time!

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Steel reinforcement is what keeps them up. At least it's supposed to.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The structure would still be damaged, although it may be “standing”.

It doesn’t work, it’s been tested plenty by people far smarter than either of us.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 6 points 1 year ago

It would stick crack and crumble around the steel. It wouldn't work here, which is why it against building codes here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nougat@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because Europe has had many more centuries worth of deforestation. The greatest resource the Americas had to offer to Europe was essentially unlimited lumber.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

And we wasted a lot of our forests on superfluous things like war ships - see the Castillan plateau which is now a dry and barren land.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] naonintendois@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In Florida houses are also built from cinder blocks because wood is too weak against hurricanes.

Edit: interiors can be built from wood, but all exterior walls are made with cinder blocks.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

So that people can remain secure like the third little pig!

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Exteriors are wood too, hurricane straps. Basically metal connectors connect everything from ground across the roof to the ground again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. Here in California, building brick structures is prohibited because of the risk during earthquakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That appears to be a military bunker of some sort

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does, doesn't it? That's before surfacing is done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I was thinking more like a commercial building than a residential.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

In Europe? Bricks and mortar

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's not like it's a "wood house" though just the framing is softwood lumber. The foundation is reinforced poured concrete, there's steel support braces, the ties and hardware are likely zinc coated steel, roof is asphalt shingles or steel, wind bracing is lumber or steel rods depending on code, could even have exterior brick or vinyl siding.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the inside of your house still have wood framing structure like this though? Looks like this neighbourhood uses vinyl siding, but you could easily have a brick/stone/stucco exterior.

Isn't it way harder to run plumbing/electric through cinder blocks, let alone hanging drywall? Or do you build a cinderblock box first and then frame the inside with wood?

This place looks like it doesn't have a basement, which is a must in Canada, and all our basements are generally concrete pour or cinderblocks, but we still have framing on the inside walls, and usually everything above the basement is wood + facade

[–] PixTupy@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Portugal here, no wood, just iron, steel and concrete. And bricks, of course.

[–] Zoidberg@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't it way harder to run plumbing/electric through cinder blocks, let alone hanging drywall? Or do you build a cinderblock box first and then frame the inside with wood?

At least in South America (where most buildings are made of brick and mortar) there's no drywall. The internal finish is a smooth layer on top of the bricks and that's it. That makes it easier to hang heavy things on the wall but also makes it impossible to run wires of any kind. It also makes repairs more difficult.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] enki@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Typically, yes. In the US at least, cinder block houses are common particularly in Florida and coastal regions. The inside would still likely have a moisture barrier and insulation on modern homes, so you will typically have wood framing for interior walls to allow for wiring, plumbing, and insulation that is then drywalled over.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Wouldn’t the inside of your house still have wood framing structure like this though? Extremely rare. Most houses built until the 1959s are made of stone and mortar, with walls at least 2 feet wide. In Northern Europe, i.e. UK, Belgium, Netherlands, parts of France and Germany, you would fund brick and mortar walls. Interior walls were built with thin hollow bricks assembled with mortar. These houses are a pain to renovate and most people just put everything agaisntbthe existing walls and then glue their drywalls on top of it with adhesive mortar. Since then, it is mostly cinder blocks or hollow brichs that are then filled with concrete. Modern building regulations impose steel reinforcement in regions prone to earthquakes. Interior walls are built with a framing of steel railings that are very light and flexible when handled but very sturdy when assembled. The drywall is screwed on each side of these rails which gives room for electrical and plumbung.

[–] CoriolisSTORM88@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm genuinely curious. I am in the southern US, Alabama specifically with the heat and humidity that entails. There are cinder block homes here, but they're mostly looked down upon and almost always have mold and mildew problems. How is that handled with brick and mortar or concrete construction?

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Double walls, with thermal insulation, external vapor barrier and built in ventilation ducts. Special additives for the mortars prevent moisture from seeping into the walls. Double or even triple pane windows and good quality, properly applied exterior paint reinforces the insulation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see why brick and mortar houses should be extra susceptible to those problems if build well. But of course Europe didn't use to see the same extremes of heat and humidity as the US does, perhaps it will become a problem in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)