Shoplifting

458 readers

1 users here now

exchanging tricks and experiences. discussing trends and events. connecting shoplifting to politcal theory and praxis. also memes.

Why a(nother) shoplifting community?

relevant server rules

be constructive
no bigotry
be empathic

additional guidelines

be careful what you post - don't incriminate yourself or others
no planning or calls for specific actions
do not derail discussions with your concerns about morality or ethics
try to provide alt texts for images - here are some tips for doing that

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

punkisundead

340

Banksy Encourages Fans to Shoplift From Guess Since Company 'Helped Themselves to My Artwork Without Asking’ (www.complex.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Five to c/shoplifting

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Excerpt:

Banksy isn’t happy with Guess’ latest collaboration.

The legendary anonymous graffiti artist had a directive for his followers on Friday, encouraging them—possibly tongue in cheek, possibly not—to visit the Regent Street Guess store in London and steal the brand’s new collection that features his artwork.

“Attention all shoplifters. Please go to Guess on Regents Street. They’ve helped themselves to my artwork without asking, how can it be wrong for you to do the same to their clothes?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ProdigalFrog 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Socialist theory makes a distinction between personal property and private property (which is what is being referenced there),

Personal property, you own it to use it.

Private property, you own it to extract value by owning it, necessarily this means you are using your ownership of this thing to exploit others.

Example: your house is personal property if you live in it but is private property if you rent it to someone else. You can see from this that things can change from personal property to private and vice versa.

Owning your own home and having your own space is perfectly reasonable within socialism.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting, that's definitely not the definition of "private" that I was thinking of when I read that post. Still not sure I completely agree, but it sounds reasonable enough.