this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
56 points (84.1% liked)

World News

32321 readers
933 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, what? Are they defining "democratic" to mean that each government has a say, regardless of how democratic that government itself actually is?

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

We can call it The Democratic People's Republic of Earth.

[–] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Sanctions and wide spread use off the of the dollar needs to be addressed in a global democratic fashion. The USA hasn't resembled anything near democratic for a bit, yet kill innocent citizens globally in the name of democracy. In the same way each vote should mean something in a democratic country, each country should have a say in what takes place globally. Makes sense when they're orchestrating multipolar international rule.

[–] LibertyLizard 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

US democracy is flawed but still stronger than most BRICS countries. Maybe all of them.

There are many shades of gray on the slide to authoritarianism.

This headline is strange. It doesn’t seem to be a quote that I can find, and none of the proposed policies really would involve more global democracy. They are mostly aimed at increasing the influence of BRICS countries at the expense of the US and its allies.

Giving more of the world’s population a greater say in global governance and decision-making is a great idea. But unfortunately there really is no one trying to push for such a thing currently.

[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The USA hasn’t resembled anything near democratic for a bit

What fantasy land are you living in?

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Russia, probably.

No, really. America has fucked up their democracy... It started good, for sure, but it keeps getting eroded (unrealistic time constraints, arbitrary boundaries and silly vetoes or weightings). I'm just sitting from the hip here, certainly no expert

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 6 points 1 year ago

Tell me, what is the likelihood that a publicly supported measure will become law on a federal level? And what about one that the public doesn’t support?