pics

Yes. You can even use a swastika if the intend is clear. For example a figure throwing it into a trashcan.

I'm not a lawyer, but the word "Heil" ist not forbidden and Also its a picture of something relevant that happened. So in my opinion the Art itself is not illegal. Only the projection onto the building.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

"Are we the baddies?"

"I dunno, our gear looks okay now?"

Yeah, there were some real conservative views on what counts as art or education and what does not that influenced that decision I figure.

It's silly regardless on both sides in my personal view. Like yeah it's a little silly to not allow it, since the law would easily have allowed for it but also - it's a Swastika, I'm fine in a video game without it, I'm not gonna die on that specific hill for sure.

Does "anti-constitutional" mean against the German constitution specifically, or the concept of constitutions?

Specifically the German constitution. Or as also worded in the law "the free democratic basic order of the FRG" -"die freiheitlich demokratische Grundordnung der BRD".

What this phrase means specifically is defined by decisions of the federal constitutional court and includes things like basic human rights, checks and balances, the independence of courts, the multi party system etc.

Disrupting or trying to abolish those basic democratic laws is considered as trying to build a dictatorship or other form of unjust system.

I don't know the specifics about the KPD case but there are German communist parties, for example the DKP. It's just that the KPD is considered undemocratic.

In addition to what others have commented, communist and all other flavors of political parties are protected under the german constitution as long as they aren't anti-democratic or call for violations of basic human rights. That's because the right to form a party and express your political opinion is also protected in the constitution. So ironically it is really hard to ban fascist parties because the highest court would have to prove that their exercising their freedom to form a political party is in conflict with other basic rights and freedoms.

Communism?

Anti-constitutional here means directed against the Basic Law of the FRG or the constitution of Brandenburg (federal state).

The Basic Law does not explicitly ban socialism, AFAIK.

The ban on Nazi imagery is kind of necessary for a state patched together in the post-liberation Allied occupation.

When one's ideological architecture if reliant on the idea that people are defined by ethnicity, whole ethnicities are good/victims and others are bad/aggressors and the ethnicity of a person determines how he or she should be treated, Fascism is but a miniscule distance away.

This applies to Israel (whose constitution very literally says the country is a nation of a single ethnicity and all those of that ethnicity are its nationals) and its sockpuppets around the World, as does in Germany where the authorities have once again revealed their black heart in connection to the Israeli Genocide.

I suspect a lot of those pseudo-idologies and organisations just served to hide those with a Fascist heart during the period when Fascism was "unfashionable" and now that it's on the rise again they're coming out in support of Fascists but using the language of the pseudo-ideology that so successfully made them seem movements for good rather than just another variant of Racist.

German police have been especially harsh on anti-genocide protesters as well.

In the United States, teenage kids were put on the sex offenders registry for sending each other nudes. Those laws are in place to protect minors from people who are not minors, but apparently the judges did not see it that way in sentencing. Gotta love the word of the law being worth more than its spirit!