this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)
Ancient History
39 readers
6 users here now
This is a space to discuss ancient archaeology, history, philosophy, etc.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree we need an explanation, however we can at this point discard the Clovis-first theory. Too much evidence has accumulated that people have been in the Americas for longer. Whether they died out or are the ancestors of Indigenous Americans is unknown. Perhaps we can discard the hypothesis that humans inevitably caused the megafauna extinctions. Your theory is plausible that it could have been a later technological or cultural change that led to the extinctions. But at this point we just need to accumulate evidence without any strict theory. Any new discovery could sink a theory, with such scant evidence of pre-Clovis ways of life. We know people were there but have little idea of how they lived.
The writing has been on the wall for Clovis-first for decades now, so I’m glad mainstream anthropology is starting to come around on this.
But I still fundamentally think that the timing and nature of megafauna extinctions across the world is difficult or impossible to explain without human hunting as a major factor. Other mass extinctions were not so exclusively confined to large animals, and there is no other competing explanation for this aspect that I have heard.
But of course, we should follow where the evidence leads. It’s just that the passage of time has destroyed most of it, unfortunately.