this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
506 points (98.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35714 readers
1105 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

That is pure laziness of whoever is responsible for puting the bags there.

Either there is a support bracket for two separate bags on the underside if that lid or the trash bin originally had two separate buckets that were taken away.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

nah its not whoever's putting the bags in, it's either management deciding it's too inefficient to deal with two streams, or the people using the bins weren't capable of separating so just threw it wherever and so it all ended up mixed anyway

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can all but guarantee it's the latter. I have even noticed this at most Starbucks. They got rid of separate bins for recycling and just do trash/landfill now.

Fwiw, recycling doesn't work anyway, except for metal. But even then it's highly dependent on people cleaning the metal before recycling.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

How about paper, glass and high density plastics?

And if wasn't for negative propaganda, pyrolotic incineration would deal with the gross majority of non recyclables.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Paper can be effectively down cycled, and corrugated cardboard is absolutely worth recycling. Glass is just borderline, it's not significantly better energy wise to recycle, and colored glass makes it more difficult. Plastic is better off in a landfill.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Glass is just borderline

It als depends on the distance and transportation costs to get to a glass plant.

Which is dissapointing, because glass should be relatively easy to recycle into new containers. The core process isn't much different than making new glass.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

The problems are breaking glass back down is more expensive than using raw material and there's the color issue. What glass excels at is reuse, it would be far better to have a handful of standard containers that could be easily cleaned and reused rather than attempt to recycle.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My understanding with glass is that it's still cheaper to make new glass than recycle it whereas metal the costs have just about evened out.

Last I read about high density plastics is that they aren't as strong after the first use. So they can't be reused as high density plastic and have to be mixed in with other plastics.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Glass is recycleable to infinity. The greatest issue that used to exist was the colourants added to tint the glass. Nowadays, to my knowledge, with enough temperature and chemical correction the tint can be removed. Even windshields can be recycled nowadays; no plastic survives after being put to a kiln thousands of degrees hot.

Plastics can be reused. Even if we start with PEHD, crushed, melt it down, and the end plastic is of lesser quality, the biggest problem is finding a new use for that weaker material.

[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Also a lot of municipal waste systems just don't pick up general recycling from commercial buildings. Usually just one dumpster for trash and one for cardboard.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Recycling is literally a scam plastic either can’t be recycled, can but are not recycled, are recycled while producing more waste than would be saved by not recycled or incinerated. Recycling plastic has never been possible they knew that from the beginning and nothing changed with modern technology. This is just shifting the blame back to himself.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's also way, way cheaper to make new plastic than to recycle it. As long as that's the case, it'll be a scam.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago

What usually happens is that people are uncultured pigs and don't separate. So the trash ends up being mixed anyway. After a few years of that, they decide there's no point in separating.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or it's well known most places don't actually recycle.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

They do, if it's profitable. Most recycling, unfortunately, costs too much for a subpar product.