this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
597 points (97.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

2875 readers
743 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

25 mph is quite bad by modern standards. So I don’t agree with this assessment. You are deliberately burning double the amount of fuel of some vehicles. I can’t speak for you but most truck drivers only use their unique attributes on an extremely intermittent basis. It would be better and cheaper to just rent a truck for the 3 times a year those people need one.

Also, diesel vehicles are extra awful in terms of local air pollution.

[–] Sagethefolxhero@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I live in a rv (also cant afford a house) and we can only afford to live in a area prone to constant wildfires so we have had to evacuate on a seconds notice often, cant rent a truck for that.

You are right about the mpg being bad by modern standards but a good portion of people drive old beaters/suvs/sports cars all of which get less mpg than a diesel truck, hell my partner got a ne subaru and it only gets 28mpg

[–] LibertyLizard 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, I'm not trying to shame all truck drivers. There are situations (like yours, it sounds like) where other options are not viable. But I still think that for the vast majority of trucks I see driving around the city, I have to wonder how necessary they are. Especially considering the number that are spotless and contain only a single passenger and no equipment or tools.

By the way, trucks get a lot of the heat right now because they are the hottest selling passenger vehicles, but the same criticisms apply to many other popular vehicles, like SUVs. The fact that many people drive these vehicles also is not really a defense. We need a radical change in all of transportation culture and methods, not just a reduction in useless truck driving. The single passenger truck is just the most emblematic of the problem currently.

[–] Sagethefolxhero@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your honestly spot on i just wanted to offer my view from my rural perspective.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago

Well thanks for your perspective. Since most people live in cities, sometimes the rural point of view gets drowned out.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I still think that for the vast majority of trucks I see driving around the city, I have to wonder how necessary they are. Especially considering the number that are spotless and contain only a single passenger and no equipment or tools.

No offence but you don't know why most people drive trucks or how so assuming why they do, or what they do based on your lack of knowing why, seems very odd.

Clean truck, dirty truck, doesn't matter. It's gatekeeping to say how people should use a truck. According to Smart Car, over 90% of driving is done with only 1 person in the vehicle which means all vehicles are bad by that standard. Yet, you're selecting trucks for some reason. What about sportscars? No one bitches about sportscars but I can assure you they are way worse than any truck, gas or diesel.

What about planes, especially private planes? Planes are over 2x worse than driving but people give a pass to anyone flying to a vacation spot.

I just find the laser focus on trucks to be so bizarre knowing how much worse other vehicles are.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I already said why in my comment—they are the most popular vehicles currently and they are emblematic of the current problems faced by our society. Yes, other vehicles are bad, and they are criticized as well. It’s weird that you mention private planes considering how widely they have been criticized recently.

But no other passenger vehicle comes close to the beloved pickup in the combination of size, danger to other road users, fuel wastefulness, lack of practicality, popularity, and of course, the toxic attitudes held by drivers. Exactly what you have outlined here: that you have the right to frivolously monopolize urban space, poison the air, and endanger lives with your choice of transportation. And even mild criticism or mockery is somehow unacceptable.

But guess what? Your freedom ends where you are actively harming the wellbeing of others. Society does have a right to demand that when you use such harmful vehicles, that you have a good reason for doing so. I hope that we will do so more strongly in the future because the Wild West attitude needs to end for all of our sakes.

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Haha yeah I used to think other peoples freedom ended when it actively harmed others too. Then the pandemic happened.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not entirely sure what you mean here, but I think it remains a solid moral principle regardless of people’s behavior in practice.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the toxic attitudes held by drivers

That's hilarious since how ultra toxic the anti-truck crowd is getting. People getting all high and mighty telling people what they can or can't own or drive.

I'm done talking with judgmental people. It's not worth the headache.

[–] LibertyLizard 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The toxic attitude I’m taking about: “I have a right to endanger and/or kill people for my own convenience and status symbol.”

The toxic attitude you are talking about: “maybe don’t do that unless you really have no choice.”

But OK you do you. Hopefully the legal system will provide a remedy to this system since people aren’t willing to be considerate on their own.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The toxic attitude you are talking about: “maybe don’t do that unless you really have no choice.”

You really aren't seeing this from both sides are you? That's not the toxic attitude I'm talking about and you damn well know it. I've got people here telling me I'm literally killing people for driving a truck, while shockingly giving other vehicles like sportscars and planes a pass.

It's hypocritical at the least and snide comments like "But OK you do you" is just simply unhelpful and doesn't solve anything.

I hope you do some self-reflecting and ask yourself, 'why am I so obsessed with telling people how to live their lives'.

[–] LibertyLizard -1 points 1 year ago

It’s not about how other people live their lives, it’s about how their selfish actions harm me and my loved ones. If trucks were as harmless as you seem to think, no one would care. But people are literally dying. I’ve had several friends and family subjected to vehicular violence, and a few near misses myself. It probably won’t be the last time either. So yes, we are a bit emotional about it. If people don’t like being shamed, then they need to fix the problem, not whine about how mean we are for standing up for the community.

Anyway I can see this is going nowhere. I think everyone could use a little more self-reflection, so I hope you take your own advice to heart.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

20mpg is not bad at all for city driving and considering what the truck can do. That is, haul heavy loads. While a small car will get much better fuel mileage, if that small car drives 5x more than my truck does, who's really impacting the environment more?

Diesel engines with a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) and DEF (Diesel Exhaust Fluid) are actually quite clean. The DPF is so restrictive it will catch pollen. Basically the DPF can remove particulates from the air whereas gas cars do not.

Basically the vehicle doesn't matter as much as how it's used.

[–] LibertyLizard 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t know why you would assume that a small car is driving 5x, that is an absurd assumption. Driving less is good… driving a smaller, more efficient vehicle less is even better.

I disagree that 20 is not that bad. Maybe compared to all the other monstrous and overbuilt vehicles Americans tend to drive but there are numerous affordable models nowadays that get 2-3x that mileage. For most people, these vehicles would be far more practical but they don’t sell as well because of the status symbol of the fancy new truck. And because some drivers don’t feel safe sharing the road with a monster truck without driving one of their own. This ends up being a race to the bottom that hurts everyone.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't an assumption, it was an example. Basically if your tiny car is so fuel efficient you drive it 50,000km yearly, that's worse than someone with a large truck that only drives 10,000km yearly. Hence, 5x more. That's not even talking about driving habits which are huge factors in maximizing fuel efficiency.

As I said before, it's much less about the vehicle and more about how it's used. High mileage fuel efficient cars are worse than non-fuel efficient trucks that don't get driven much. Fuel efficient cars can give the driver a false sense of helping the environment so they think they can drive more without impacting the environment, which is wrong.

20mph in the city is decent. 30mpg on the highway is better than most if not all sportscars on the market. Planes are 2x worse but again, no one bitches because they want to fly to their vacation vs. not going anywhere to save the planet.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But if you are concerned about your impact why would you not do both? Try to reduce driving, but also drive a lower impact vehicle?

The reason trucks get dunked on is because they’re really impractical as passenger vehicles in cities yet they are extremely popular. Reducing driving and flying, while good things, do have significant costs for people who are trying to lessen their impacts. Especially the newer huge trucks like the one pictured here—I have to use one for work and it’s not even good at transporting things because the bed is way too high and the cab is huge—because people buy these not as work vehicles, but as passenger vehicles. But they are so expensive and bad as passenger vehicles that you are much better off not driving one.

I already addressed the sports car thing—they are also bad and there are dozens of better vehicles. An elephant is not small because a whale is bigger.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you are concerned about your impact why would you not do both? Try to reduce driving, but also drive a lower impact vehicle?

Maybe I am, but no is asking. The mere fact that I own a truck is a problem for these people. How much I drive, how I drive aren't factors. I'm simply wrong for choosing a truck, regardless of reasons. If someone has a fuel efficient car and drives all the time, you give that a pass but if I barely drive a truck, I'm a monster.

The anti-truck crowd is just too annoying to listen to.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if you are driving a gas-guzzler you are definitionally not doing both, so there’s no real need to ask.

I acknowledge that there are legitimate reasons to drive a pickup, it’s just that those reasons are far more rare than the number of pickups clogging the roads of my city or nearly running me over. So something has to give here.

PS: I also shame people who drive too much so that’s not accurate.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I acknowledge that there are legitimate reasons to drive a pickup, it’s just that those reasons are far more rare than the number of pickups clogging the roads of my city or nearly running me over. So something has to give here.

Rare according to your experience? Sorry, that's not how real life works. Your fear of trucks doesn't mean the rest of us have to cater to those fears.

Shaming people is a dick move. You're not perfect so why judge others? Glass houses etc.

[–] LibertyLizard 1 points 1 year ago

Public shaming is good when you're doing things that hurt people. I also do those things sometimes and I would not mind being shamed a bit for them. It makes it easier to do the right thing.