this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
82 points (87.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43968 readers
1604 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Funko Pops, to me.

I understand that some of them are fairly overpriced, but I also really like them as is. It doesn't work on all characters, but it sometimes work on a lot and there's so much representation and variety that it's good to have a few.

If people want to talk about waste of plastic and vinyl, they should bark at the companies who make teeny tiny figurines that serve no purpose and have so little detail that spending any money on them is a waste.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Funko Pops

Imo they aren't getting nearly enough of hate they deserve. I'm not against figure collecting in general but FP are the ugliest motherfucking thing i ever seen in this department, for the same amount of resources, labour and energy they could produce something much better. In fact, a consistent long serie of figures faithful to the original (not ultra-deformed) across so many franchises would been great, but alas only thing there is are those unholy abominations.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They are the opposite of art in every imaginable way.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

Yes, but english language call "art" literally everything made with even a slightest hint of intention, which those things had to be because there is no other purpose (except lining the pockets of publishing mafia).

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I also take issue with buying something that does nothing. “Oh I’m going to put this on that shelf and never touch it again”. It screams cash grab. They’re made of brittle plastic so you can’t play with them. And as you say, they’re ugly.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would argue that collecting things having purely aesthetical value is also legit, though there is an issue about manufactured demand and role of merchandise in popculture, but fair enough.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I see benefits of displaying art made by a person, but I take issue with collecting. It feels like a form of hoarding.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

I collect comics, which are (printed, yes, but) art made by people. Sometimes I'll sell off a run, some I'll keep forever because they're fantastic. Different strokes ig.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It definitely can be, for example art is very often hoarded as form of investment, and this can be a much lower-price form of the same, but not necessarily. I would say the more those things price is, the more chance for hoarding.

That is, economically. If you mean hoarding as in psychology probably it's more depending on person, a lot of people i know including me were collecting more or less useless things but nobody i know went into true hoarding problem and most of those people at some point got bored and got rid of their collections. Other than above personal experience, idk.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 22 hours ago

Those dead-eyed monstrosities stare deep into my soul and give me a case of the howling fantods, so yes, agree.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

long serie of figures faithful

I hate to be that person, but the singular of "series" is "series". There is no singular called "serie".